Showing posts with label political-religious dominionism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political-religious dominionism. Show all posts

Jun 16, 2017

Fascism in America Rises in the North

The Raft of the Medusa, Théodore Géricault (1791–1824)
Madison, Wisconsin — A Georgia voice offered comment by phone asserting racism is more prevalent in the rural North than the rural South.

Fascism in America—Trump, Republican-ruled rural jurisdictions in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Ohio, and likely your local police force—comes with a northern intonation of sorts as often as a southern drawl

Wisconsin Republicans and their religious right allies, for example, staff virtually every tentacle of government from the Census to polling sites to local planning commissions and school boards, and their mission is malice for Jesus.

If you meet a dominionist, religious fundie staffing a polling place, (a Ron Johnson or Dale Zahorik of Fitchburg, Wisconsin for example), it won't surprise to find a frightening ignorance of, and hostility to voting rights and the rights of blacks and Latinos, who are, goddamn that Fourteenth Amendment, full citizens under the law.

Advice this weekend before Mal signs off: Treat calls for "unity" with proper derision.

Feb 2, 2015

Scott Walker's 'Boots on the Ground, War Everywhere' Comments Show Defects

Scott Walker wants war anywhere and everywhere

Updated - DesmoinesDem of the Bleeding Heartland in Iowa repeats an assessment that Scott Walker remains the leading Republican presidential candidate for the Iowa caucuses, a view sustained by the Des Moines Register's just-published Register/Bloomberg Politics Iowa poll.

Walker's inability to coherently answer a follow-up question in an interview with Martha Raddatz of ABC News on national television will add to Walker's stature among Iowa Republican caucus-goers, and will lead Walker into ridicule territory for most everyone else.

Walker appeared stumped when Raddatz asked for an explanation of what Walker means when he said the United States needs to be "very aggressive" in foreign policy.

Walker responded that U.S. foreign policy needs to be prepared contra President Obama for "boots on the ground" .... "anywhere in the world," policies "that don't allow those [ISIS] measures, those attacks, those abuses to come to our shores." (Milewski, Capital Times) (Peterson, Democurmdgeon) (DeFour, Wisconsin State Journal)

That 'aggression' in international relations and international law is considered a crime seems to have escaped Walker's extemporaneous responses to Raddatz' follow-up. (See Harris, Robert H. Jackson Center and Wilmshurst, United Nations)

"Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who has surged to the top of the potential GOP presidential field, said on 'This Week' Sunday that he wouldn’t rule out putting U.S. boots on the ground in Syria if he were the commander-in-chief." (Puckett, ABC News) (ABC News Transcript)

Waging a new war in Syria is crazy.

And casually stating an intention to go to war "anywhere" makes Walker appear more like Sarah Palin than say, Richard Falk, Chris Hedges or William J. Astore.

Scott Walker is an Evangelical extremist who is very weak on public policy, an odd defect for someone seeking the presidency, and he is finding hiding this fact can present problems as he appeals to fellow religious right travelers in Iowa.

Walker is already getting panned for "falling on his face" (Easley, PoliticusUSA) in a softball interview.

"When Walker says, 'I wouldn’t rule anything out,' does that mean that he hasn’t given much thought to any of these questions, or is he really that irresponsible?" (Larison, The American Conservative)
---
The winners of the past two Iowa Republican Caucuses are Rick Santorum (2012) and Mike Huckabee (2008), hence one can conclude the Iowa GOP caucuses are not instructive to whom the GOP selects as its presidential nominee.

But Iowa will present to the nation the personal weaknesses and ideological extremism that define Walker in Wisconsin as he is introduced via the Koch brothers and other billionaires.

At home in Wisconsin Scott Walker has waged 'aggressive' wars against domestic enemies such as the University of Wisconsin System, K-12 public education, the entire city of Milwaukee, fresh water and the state budget.

Michael Auslin writes in the National Review this morning:
It’s hard to overestimate the importance of this Slate article, 'Divide and Conquer,' by Jamelle Bouie. He has done the GOP a favor by revealing the Democratic party’s strategic plan for defeating Scott Walker in 2016: smearing him as a 'divisive' candidate who will send dog whistles to his white supporters and seek to run the table with the still-majority white voters to win the White House. ...

He is no popular media sideshow like Sarah Palin or Donald Trump. Nor does he have the electoral or familial baggage of Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush. He is the real deal, a Midwestern conservative who has successfully taken on public unions and governed a center-left state.

I think that ship has sailed already; Walker is the most divisive and toxic figure in Wisconsin history since Joe McCarthy, and as Bouie in Slate notes: "Unlike Mitt Romney—who was merely adopted by the world of racially polarized politics—Walker was born in it and molded by it. As [Alec] MacGillis [TNR] notes, Walker’s home turf of metropolitan Milwaukee is home to 'profound racial inequality, extreme political segregation, [and] a parallel-universe news media,' trends that predate Walker, 'but have enabled his ascent.'"

Though much is made of Scott Walker (and former governor Tommy Thompson (1987-2001)) winning in blueish-state Wisconsin, Wisconsin's gubernatorial elections are held in midterm presidential election years when the turn-out is stronger for white, rural and older voters that trend Republican.

Neither Walker nor Thompson ever reached over across party lines, and both demonized the minority citizenry, with Walker merely radicalizing political tactics and trends that Thompson began with more subtlety and less venom.

Scott Walker is running underground—hiding from his association and with the his patrons, plutocrats, his criminal past, his radicalism and racism.

The idea that Walker could be a unifying figure is like calling Sarah Palin an imposing intellect.

MacGillis at TNR knocked down this nonsense down last year, but to anyone who knows Wisconsin politics at all—like Joan Walsh—this is simply an affirmation of the axiomatic.

The fact that Walker is a lightweight would just make exposing him to the nation an easier project for Hillary in 2016, no matter how many times Walker says, we have to invade and be very aggressive.

As Uppity Wisconsin notes: "Since Walker has become governor we're are experiencing a kind of anti-intellectualism that has only occurred below the Mason-Dixon line in the past."

Jan 13, 2015

Military Civil Rights Group Slandered by Vatican-Affiliated Journal

Bonnie Weinstein's new book on
Rightwing Christian Hatred
One thing about rightwing religionists, they are devoted in their hatred of Mikey Weinstein, that "little Jewish radical who is scaring the pants off of you," as Pat Robertson put it.

Not sure how Mikey Weinstein manages to inflame rightwingers as Mikey's mission is simply to fight for the rights of U.S. service members to worship or not worship as they see fit, a mission that is a cornerstone of the United States Constitution guaranteeing ". . . no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

The U.S. Constitution, by the way, is featured in the oath that U.S. service members swear to support and defend.

Yet, religious rightwingers are devoted to their own ideology first, and Mikey Weinstein, the founder and voice of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) is now being slandered by the Vatican-affiliated Aleteia journal for fundamentalists.

Aleteia typically features pieces about the dangers of the "Devil's Lies," and so forth and of course Mikey Weinstein and MRFF's alleged lies about who Mikey is (TEK Journalism UK).


"To The Far Right Christian Hater… You Can be a Good
Speller or a Hater, But You Can’t Be Both
" - Bonnie Weinstein
Slander is SOP from the fundies. And so are death threats.

Mikey and Bonnie Weinstein, co-founders of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, began the MRFF when their son heard one too many kike 'jokes' from the religious Dominionists at the U.S. Air Force Academy he was attending as rampant evangelical proselytization accelerated in the U.S. military (Sharlet, Harper's Magazine).

Since then, their email inbox is laden daily with the most repulsive, anti-Semitic, hate mail one could write. Sick stuff.

After years of receiving virtual hate and crazed rants, Bonnie Weinstein chronicles these vile texts in her new book To the Far Right Christian Hater . . . You Can Be a Good Speller or a Hater, but You Can't Be Both, most of which is argument-free from the proposition that only one official Christian God must be worshiped in the U.S. military, and of course the assertion Mikey and his family are demons destined to hell fire, and a 200-mile river of blood (see also Hardy, Columbus Dispatch).

The Weinsteins and the MRFF work for the rights of individuals serving in the armed forces.

But as documented, the U.S. military is fraught with rightwing lunatics just below general and flag-officer class, such as the now-retired William 'Jerry' Boykin, a goon who called Mikey Weinstein a "demon" while still actively serving.

As Republican candidates for president line up with several declaring a warrant from God [Scott Walker and Mike Huckabee, for example], Bonnie Weinstein's book should be read with a view to what the next U.S. commander-in-chief has in mind and whether, like President Obama, he [the GOP nominates men)] believes in defending the Constitution for all, including American civilians.

Feb 23, 2013

Scott Walker's Attack on Public Schools

GOP-Religious right attack on schools -
Image by Shutterstock.com
Scott Walker's 2011 "unprecedented $900 million cut to school funding, coupled with a scheme to create a state-run system of charter schools" is an attack on professional public teachers, unions, and staff.

Two year later, Wisconsin sees Walker propose "$73 million more for voucher schools, $23 million more for charter schools, and $21 million for special needs students to attend private schools."

Walker took his show on the road in 2011,12, and 13 at right-wing venues such as the American Federation for Children's "School Choice Now: Empowering America's Children" policy summit.

Walker, and the right-wing billionaires and Christian zealots he represents, seek nothing less than the destruction of the public school system, replaced with a tax-payer-financed, Christian-oriented, biblically-centered 'learning network.'

Now (Feb. 13), Walker proposes a nearly $70 billion biennial budget that again hits public schools, municipalities, and anything public, including selling off public assets such as state power plants.

K.C. Boyd has an excellent summary:

One can trace the development of today’s right wing Christian think takes to the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s. Religiously conservative people, motivated by their perceived degradation of society, quietly perfected their skills, all the while grooming their own young adherents, played an effective long-game that continues to win (and corrupt) the hearts and minds of a significant segment of our youth. Indeed, there is no better way to affect the future than by propagandizing the young. In this current post election season, the Biblically driven, often racist, members of society are once again regrouping to fight another day.

With the money of wealth funders like Richard and Betsy DeVos (sister of Blackwater scion Eric Prince and daughter of Elsa and Edgar Prince of the Amway fortune) and the Walton, Koch and Scaife Foundations, simpatico politicians are hard at work bringing Dominionist ideals quietly into the forefront of American education policy. While much of the country argues about budgets, deficits, and guns, a cleverly camouflaged package of School Choice and ”Bible-driven curricula“ make their way up the ladder.

On the surface, School Choice is purportedly about increasing opportunities for inner city and rural youth. The all-important subtext, however, is that School Choice is really about freeing up dollars for Christian-based education. An important arrow that energizes today’s religious quiver is the intentional misuse of language in changing the debate by referring to public schools as “government schools” and public education as a “government school monopoly,” thus instantly and directly speaking to Tea Partiers and Libertarians. ...

Of particular concern is the textbook-like use of scripture to condone homophobia, to slander blacks and Jews, and to deny basic climate and evolutionary science. And Texas is not alone. According to The National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools’ website over a half a million students have already taken these courses nationally for credit. Take a half a million public school minds along with those who are already enrolled in religious schools or who are homeschooled, multiply it by a decade and it’s easy to see why it matters. ...

It is critical that Americans recognize not only the intent to privatize our schools but the vast Christian Right agenda behind it. Whether from curricula control and out of order teachers in our public schools, or from the voucherization leading to fundamentalist Christian-based schools, charter schools and Christian homeschooling, a generation of children so educated will graduate from high school ill-equipped to face the realities of a science based world.

Oct 19, 2012

Military Civil Rights Union Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

In the face of fierce attacks by right wing Christian dominionists on the ideal of a secular U.S. military (and an officially secular U.S. government) and the preservation of the constitutional guarantee of no religious test for public office or trust, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation has received the nomination the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize. - Letter nominating the Military Religious Freedom Foundation for the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize.

Via the Military Religious Freedom Foundation

Thorbjørn Jagland
Chairman Nobel Prize Committee

Dear Chairman Jagland and Nobel Peace Prize Committee members:

Clause 3, Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution

In the midst of the present global economic crisis, tensions between nations and peoples have all-too-frequently erupted in horrific violence. Much of this violence has emanated from those who have sought to justify their atrocities by means of theology. They advance their dark agendas under the false pretext of divine mandate, the fulfillment of “End Times” eschatology, neo-“Crusader” aspirations, or a twisted and falsified conception of the sacred Islamic duty of “Jihad.” U.S. Air Force Academy honor graduate Michael L. “Mikey” Weinstein initially founded the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF; www.militaryreligiousfreedom.org) in 2005 to fight back against religious discrimination within the United States Armed Forces. Weinstein’s overriding goal focuses on the protection of the “wall” separating church and state in the U.S. military, a legal barrier with foundations in the United States Constitution which is being worn away through a process of attrition by homegrown religious extremists. The discrimination faced by Weinstein, as well as that faced by his military academy graduate children, is the clear result of an ever-expanding Christian Fundamentalist hegemonic foothold within the U.S. military.

Mikey Weinstein’s fearlessly outspoken approach has resulted in MRFF standing as the sole beacon of civil rights protection for servicemembers who have encountered pervasive prejudice, bigotry, and related horrid civil rights abuses against their religious liberties resulting from their expressed religious faith (or lack thereof). These incidents have included forced attendance at Christian prayer ceremonies and events, hazing on religious grounds, and persecution that has run the gamut from routine belittlement to forms of “witch-hunting.” These incidents are horrifyingly redolent of the darkest periods in the history of the United States. In a shocking testament to this intolerable and unjust environment, over 30,000 active duty United States marines, sailors, airmen, soldiers, veterans, and civilian personnel have swollen the ranks of MRFF’s clientele. This shockingly-large roster of clients includes all individuals who have contacted or retained the services of the foundation. Eleven of these clients have been Killed in Action, as was a valued core MRFF Advisory Board Member. Among these tens of thousands of aggrieved servicemembers, the vast majority – nearly 96% – are Christians (Roman Catholic, Protestant, and Eastern Orthodox) who face persecution on account of their perceived lack of fundamentalist evangelical zeal.

The trauma of prolonged warfare is taking a heavy toll on troop morale, leading to devastating suicide rates among active duty service members and veterans of foreign conflicts. These stresses constitute an all-too-common consequence of all war, and are hardly isolated to servicemembers and veterans alone. However, this trauma also has a deleterious effect among civilians, and leads to the deterioration of families. In September 2012, the U.S. Army even held its first “Stand-down” to address the suicide epidemic. Shockingly, soldiers were then forced to undergo a coerced mass Christian prayer ceremony. Needless to say, this is a manner of proselytizing that is perniciously predatory, and deals grievous blows to the health of American society as a whole.

What Weinstein and MRFF are fighting against is nothing less than an evangelical fundamentalist coup within the United States Armed Forces. This Christian extremist fifth column has its roots in a Cold War-era alliance between the U.S. Department of Defense and militant outfits such as the Christian Anti-Communism Crusade and the Church of the Christian Crusade. However, successive generations of military leadership have preserved this alliance far beyond its original Cold War/anti-communist shelf life. The result has been a U.S. military that is steeped in a highly caustic brew of sectarianism, domineering religious bigotry, and an arrogant, dehumanizing attitude towards the civilian populations of the regions where the U.S. finds itself militarily engaged.

The United States’ proclaimed goals of facilitating dialogue between civilizations and cultures, while securing global peace in the process, are starkly undermined by a culture within its armed forces that equates implements of death and mass destruction with the “soul-saving” tools of Christian missionaries. This ultra-nationalist, deluded undercurrent within the armed forces is precisely what Mr. Weinstein and MRFF have committed to fighting. MRFF utilizes all manners of media tools as well as federal and state litigation to forthrightly confront every manifestation of “Dominionism” that has arisen from within the ranks of the U.S. military, as well as its halls of academia.

Indeed, MRFF, with Mr. Weinstein at its helm, has uncovered the unabashed, brazen display of militant religious regalia and iconography within the United States military. In many cases, MRFF has halted their usage after shining a bright constitutional spotlight on the dubious legality of associating church with state.

Such was the case when, in this past Spring of 2012, Beaufort, South Carolina-based Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 122 (VMFA-122) changed its name from the “Werewolves” to the “Crusaders.” Squadron Commander Lt. Col. Wade Wiegel showed his astounding historical ignorance when stating that “The name change is a reflection of our heritage… [it is] not politically incorrect”! As far as the “political correctness” of such an inflammatory move is concerned, we’ll leave that up to others to judge. However, any criteria for “correctness” should take into account the fact that in the Arab and Muslim collective memory, “Crusader” is no meaningless appellation. To Arabs and Muslims, “Crusader” is synonymous with a genocidal campaign of colonial banditry, occupation, and mass slaughter initiated by Christians from the West. As Mikey Weinstein correctly noted at the time, “The Crusades serve as a hideous testament to the noxious danger embodied by the foreboding alloy of weaponized theology.” What purpose could such a provocation serve, besides circulating this “weaponized theology” throughout the U.S. military?

“Weaponized theology” is an apt description of the so-called “Jesus Rifles” and “Jesus Nukes,” phrases which conflict with the true gospel of Christ as understood by countless generations of faithful Christians. However, under the auspices of highly ranked evangelical fundamentalist Christians within the top echelons of the U.S. military, both Jesus Rifles and Jesus Nukes have become an absurd reality. In January 2010, MRFF uncovered the fact that military contractor Trijicon was branding its scopes with New Testament Biblical citations. MRFF pressure led to the provision of kits by the Department of Defense meant to scrub off the engravings. Unfortunately, as of October 2012, many of these rifle scopes still carry the citations. This travesty sends a clear message to the United States’ ostensible allies in the Muslim world that a nontrivial number of U.S. service personnel indeed see their tools of death as a means to advance a missionary agenda. In July 2011, MRFF exposed decades-old official USAF presentation materials used to train countless Air Force nuclear missile launch officers on the ethics of nuclear warfare by citing New Testament verses and Christian “Just War” theory. These wretched presentations, known colloquially within the Air Force as the “Jesus Loves Nukes” speech, were swiftly pulled from USAF curriculum within days of their worldwide exposure by MRFF, and a complete audit of other training materials was ordered. However, it is unknown how many active-duty Air Force officers, having been entrusted with the most destructive weapons known to humankind, believe that their fundamentalist Christian faith must guide whether they launch a nuclear missile or not.

There have been countless other examples where MRFF advocacy has played a crucial role in stemming the tide of evangelical fundamentalist zeal within and throughout the U.S. military. From the unconstitutional endorsement of Islamophobic, warmongering, so-called “charities” such as Rev. Franklin Graham’s Operation Christmas Child to the extension of invitations to dyed-in-the-wool Christian militarists like Gen. “Jerry” Boykin, Mr. Weinstein and MRFF have ceaselessly struggled to regain the footing of a U.S. military that seems positively spellbound by belligerent religiosity. MRFF also managed to successfully have the official insignia of the four service branches removed from so-called “Military Bibles” filled with fundamentalist addenda. For this reason, Mr. Weinstein, his family, and MRFF are almost daily in receipt of vile hate mail and death threats, many of which cite the same “fire and brimstone” imprecatory curses and biblical citations.

Mikey Weinstein’s fervent commitment has led to concrete results, including the introduction of guidelines meant to rein in the rampant abuse of commission that comes in the form of Christian fundamentalist agitation in the ranks of the armed forces. MRFF pressure, and a string of embarrassing incidents uncovered by the Foundation, directly culminated in the issuance of Air Force Instruction 1-1 Standards of Conduct. This AFI 1-1 document requires total mandatory compliance on penalty of potential adverse criminal action, including courts martial, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The document requires non-chaplain officers and supervisors to “avoid the actual or apparent use of their position to promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to extend preferential treatment for any religion.” This new Air Force directive gives teeth to the explicit constitutional proscription of unauthorized proselytization or endorsements of religious organizations.

Mr. Weinstein has received numerous honors for his efforts to advance MRFF’s humanitarian civil rights cause. The foremost Jewish publication, The Forward, named Weinstein one of 2006’s “Forward 50” for his contributions in the sphere of “Ideas & Activism.” Weinstein has also received the prestigious honor of the Jews for Racial and Economic Justice’s Rabbi Marshall T. Meyer Risk-Taker Award in 2008. In 2010, Weinstein received the Anne Froehlich Political Courage Award from the Pacific Palisades Democratic Club in Los Angeles, California, joining the prestigious ranks of past awardees such as Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV, former talk show host Phil Donahue, and Daniel Ellsberg of “Pentagon Papers” fame. MRFF has received four total nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize, for award years 2010, 2011, and 2012. Mr. Weinstein’s list of honors was capped in November of 2011 when he received the inaugural “Person of the Year” award from Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

The ongoing efforts of Mr. Weinstein’s organization have earned MRFF acclaim as a trusted go-to source for aggrieved servicemembers seeking redress for the affronts they’ve been forced to tolerate in silence. MRFF is the only civil rights organization dealing solely with issues of religious freedom, tolerance, and respect within the U.S. military for both “faith” and “no faith” adherents.

The United States Armed Forces possesses the largest arsenals of both conventional and unconventional weaponry known to mankind, and is ominously more than capable of bringing about the “end times” level of destruction that many evangelical fundamentalist Christians excitedly await. Furthermore, considering the United States military’s global presence and ability to project force, issues that affect the U.S. military truly concern the entire world. The Military Religious Freedom Foundation’s ongoing vital work to prevent religious extremism from turning our military into a nuclear weapons-fueled 21st century Crusade continues to concretely advance the cause of universal world peace, and promote a universal fraternity between nations.

In consideration of the innumerable accomplishments and important ongoing tasks that this civil rights organization has undertaken to guard against religious extremism and ensure the basic human right of religious freedom in the U.S. Armed Forces, both domestically and in all nations where they are present, it is my honor and privilege to hereby submit my nomination of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation for the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize.

Sincerely, [Name redacted]
[Organization redacted]

Sep 14, 2011

USAF Chief Affirms No Religious Test Policy for Military

 Clause 3, Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution

In the wake of an exclusive report in Truthout [Leopold] last July revealing that for two decades the Air Force used Bible passages, religious imagery and NAZI citations to instruct nuclear missile officers on the morality of launching nuclear weapons, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton A. Schwartz issued a policy memorandum sent Tuesday to all major commands that affirms the No Establishment Clause, the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, as well as Clause 3, Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution specifically prohibiting a religious test for public office and trust.

The policy is a victory against the efforts of a pervasive force in the military, political-religious dominionism, a Chistitian nationalist movement seeking to institute its version of authoritarian Christianity, that endorses theocratic visions of "biblical law," codified in major spheres of American society, most troubling in the U.S. military."

Mikey Weinstein, the President and Founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation that works to ensure religious freedom for all U.S. service members broke the story with writer, Jason Leopold, with a religiously-oriented PowerPoint training presentation and Air Force documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Weinstein, perhaps dominionism's most visible enemy for his dedication to civil rights and pluralism, is known as the "constitutional conscience of the U.S. military," and is recognized as the MRFF site notes as "the undisputed leader of the national movement to restore the obliterated wall separating church and state in the most technologically lethal organization ever created by humankind: the United States armed forces," a designation that brings his family, friends and Weinstein routine death threats, or mundanely prayers that he be killed or consigned to hell.

Weinstein reacted to Gen. Schwartz' memorandum, "Maintaining Government Neutrality Regarding Religion" with the following statement:
General Schwartz deserves significant kudos and comprehensive congratulations for being THE most senior Pentagon official to date to ever send this strong a mandate of Constitutional religious compliance to our United States armed forces members. While MRFF wishes that such a letter had been sent by the Chief of Staff of the Air Force a very long time ago, the old adage 'better late than never' most certainly applies. While this letter may not be a home run, it is a damn good line drive single to potentially start a rally of Constitutional religious freedom compliance, which has been scandalously lacking in the entire Defense Department for decades. Gen. Schwartz has the U.S. Air Force at least now 'talking the talk.' Whether the USAF can 'walk the walk' will depend upon many factors, not the least of which is whether ANYONE in the Air Force is EVER punished for violating its clear mandates of Constitutional recognition for BOTH the No Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the Bill of Rights' First Amendment. To that end, we must all remember that while the First Commandment says, 'You can't have any other Gods before Me,' the First Amendment says, 'Oh yes you can!'
Below is the text of Gen. Schwartz' memorandum.

MEMORANDUM FOR ALMAJCOM-FOA-DRU/CC

FROM: HQ USAF/CC
1670 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330-1670

SUBJECT: Maintaining Government Neutrality Regarding Religion

Leaders at all levels must balance Constitutional protections for an individual’s free exercise of religion or other personal beliefs and its prohibition against governmental establishment of religion. For example, they must avoid the actual or apparent use of their position to promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to extend preferential treatment for any religion. Commanders or supervisors who engage in such behavior may cause members to doubt their impartiality and objectivity. The potential result is a degradation of the unit’s morale, good order, and discipline.

Chaplain Corps programs, including activities such as religious studies, faith sharing, and prayer meetings, are vital to commanders’ support of individual Airmen’s needs and provide opportunities for the free exercise of religion. Although commanders are responsible for these programs they must refrain from appearing to officially endorse religion generally or any particular religion. Therefore, I expect chaplains, not commanders, to notify Airmen of Chaplain Corps programs.

Our chaplains are trained to provide advice to leadership on matters related to the free exercise of religion and to help commanders care for all of their people, regardless of their beliefs. If you have concerns involving the preservation of government neutrality regarding religious beliefs, consult with your chaplain and staff judge advocate before you act.

NORTON A. SCHWARTZ
General, USAF
Chief of Staff