Showing posts with label Penny Brummer wrongful conviction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Penny Brummer wrongful conviction. Show all posts

Oct 23, 2017

Humans Suffer at Alter of Stupidity in Wisconsin

Goya, Saturn Devouring His Son,
painted sometime between 1819-1823.
The image represents America today,
as the country teeters on the brink.
Updated - Madison, Wisconsin—A piece in Vox Media by Sean Illing reports from a Yale Conference held this month noting democracy failings accelerating with Donald Trump and ascendant Republicans, including hostility towards liberties of people, who still enjoy an undulating significance in American society.

Of course, since America's birth popular liberty has been a lie for most living at a given moment. Those charged through history with keeping the faith of America as represented in rhetoric and myth, that is our fellow citizens, are typically ignorant, irrational and stupid, (Achen, Bartels).

Today, as contemptible as Trump and his white-supremacist followers are, one should note neo-liberals and Hillary Clinton have blazed the trail for Trumpists by promoting private prisons, mass incarceration, distribution of public resources to the one percent and unthinking corporatist tropes in politics.

On the up-side, a plurality of Americans reject neo-liberalism and fascism.

There are moments caught in American reporting that mark in iconic description the reality of American society. Wisconsin is at ground zero in hostility against democratic traditions with a strong ferment of pro-democratic institutions now under Republican-corporate attack.

Long Lake, No Wake

In Wisconsin in 2013, Kate Golden at the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Reporting took a famous shot looking out at Long Lake in central Wisconsin, (Plainfield, Waushara County), of a sign reading, "Long Lake, No Wake," surrounded by instead of water, dried-out weeds, trees next to ironic fishing-rules signage.

The proliferation of high-capacity water wells by Big Agriculture has depleted ground and surface waters, and lakes are literally drying up. Gov. Scott Walker and Republicans have worked specifically to make this crisis situation worse since 2011 with one Party objective being that multi-generational Wisconsin families become disgusted and leave the state.

Obama's Plan, White Slavery

In April 2009, Jesse Russell shot a small group of white Tea Party ralliers at the Wisconsin capitol in Madison. Russell captured a man holding a sign reading, "Obama's Plan, White Slavery."

The sign refers to the proposed 2009 Obamacare bill. No American white person was actually enslaved after the implementation of the Obamacare plan, but the sheer lunacy that drove opposition to Obama, and tame healthcare reforms led to the 2016 election of Trump, and was on display in Russell's iconic image, first published April 15, 2009 in The Lost Albatross.

An innocent woman was arrested and convicted because she is
an out lesbian. Railroaded by deceitful Madison and Dane
County police, found guilty by bigoted jurors, Penny Brummer
remains in prison today. This is a
crime committed by the state that no one wants to face.
Innocent Woman Imprisoned as Life Goes on in Dane County Wisconsin

When movements for civil rights, equality, innocence met the Police State in Wisconsin in 1994, the Police State won in Brummer v. Wisconsin.

An innocent Madison woman, Penny Brummer, is in prison for 23 years now since former Dane County Judge Patrick Fiedler in October 1994 declared at the murder trial that circumstantial evidence is "strong enough to exclude to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis of the defendant's innocence." Fiedler is nuts.

A honest human being, not Fielder, would have rejected the jury's verdict. See Penny Brummer. See Brummer-Mal Contends, Lueders-Isthmus, Ricks-The Advocate, and the Huffington Post, Wisconsin State Journal.

One honest woman, a paralegal Sheila Berry, listened to her daughter who read about this outrage in The Advocate. "You should do something," Berry's daughter said.

Berry wrote a book, Who Killed Sarah? This reporting is momentous, and one hopes can save a life.

Shelia Berry is modern-day Émile Zola, a Sidney Powell, a pro-liberty human being who says innocents do not belong in prison, not ever.

By now, many readers have seen or heard of Making a Murderer, the tale of vengeful law enforcement hicks from Manitowoc County Wisconsin preying on an intellectually challenged juvenile and framing a man suing Manitowoc County for $36 million in a civil lawsuit for a wrongful conviction.

While shocking to some, the capacity and inclination of law enforcement to harass, arrest, prosecute and convict is axiomatic to most criminal defense attorneys, intellectually honest scholars and certainly those citizens on the receiving end of the blunt instrument known as law enforcement by the "Sovereign," the "state in all its power and glory," as described to me by federal appellate attorney, Sidney Powell, a former Asst. U.S. Attorney.

The victims of Manitowoc County, (a region in east-central Wisconsin from which I hail), are a victims, a disgrace wrought by law enforcement.

But the progressive fountain of Dane County Wisconsin (Madison) is arguably worse than Manty County in the criminal justice realm.

Folks, we live in a police-prosecutor-prison state, (and its existence is a compelling argument for a coalition of the American libertarian right and left)

I present to you one Penny Brummer, an out lesbian who joined the military right of River Valley High School in Spring Green, Wisconsin and served honorably in the Air Force for five years before returning home and then moving to Madison in the early 1990s.

In her mid-20s, Penny fell in and out of love, drank beer and bar-hopped, rode motorcycles, living her life in a similar fashion to most young 20-somethings in Madison, Wisconsin.

In the early to late 1990s, Madison was not a welcoming place for the LGBTQ community by Madison law enforcement, whatever you may have heard about Madison being an progressive oasis with an enlightened police force.

Police harassment and hostility were tolerated by progressives and to this day, for example, the former Club 3054 on East Washington Street, the main drag in Madison, is recalled for targeting by the cops by former patrons.

So it was one March 15, 1994, after Penny broke up with her girlfriend, and looking for company called friends and co-workers to "go out" on a Monday night. Sarah Gonstead said, yes, and Ms. Gonstead and Penny happily bar-hopped before Penny dropped Gonstead off at a frequented short-cut to her ex’s place, where Penny saw Gonstead strike up a conversation with some guys next to a line of motorcycles, one of the men with long hair and slight build.

No one saw Sarah Gonstead alive again.

Gonstead’s body was found on April 9 outside of Madison.

Madison police and the Dane County Sheriff’s detectives decided Penny, 24-years-old, was the perpetrator.

No physical evidence, no weapon, no motive, no determined crime scene, just a half-baked theory about lesbians being violent—police "tunnel vision," disregarding all exculpatory facts and evidence that would not support or disconfirm the theory.

For example,as recounted by Sheila Berry in her book, Who Killed Sarah:

David Zoromski, who reported seeing a suspicious man standing by the open passenger door of a parked pickup truck exactly where Sarah’s body was later found, was told by a Dane County Sheriff’s Deputy, ‘What you saw is all very interesting, but we have a suspect and it doesn’t fit.’ The man seen by Mr. Zoromski matched the description of the person Penny said she saw Sarah talking to near the Taco Bell at East Washington Avenue and North Oak Street in Madison, [by the short-cut], after she dropped her off that night. Police identified him and knew he was a convicted felon with a long history of violence toward women — but they never followed up on this lead.

A new trial for Penny Brummer is demanded by advocates. They also offer a $10,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person(s) responsible for the death of Sarah Gonstead, and an 800 number for tips at 800 407-1178.

Brummer today sits in prison serving her 50-year sentence.

Prof. Keith Findley of the Wisconsin Innocence Project concludes in a column in the Washington Post after Making a Murderer hit the public consciousness: "We must make the system more responsive to post-conviction claims of injustice and less bound by blind obedience to finality."

Blind obedience is the norm in American society.

No jurist, journalist, or Brummer family member believes the kangaroo trial of 1994 could happen today, 23 years later at a time when we want to believe bigotry trumps an unthinking police state that could allow the Brummer persecution to occur.

The police investigation was replete with anti-lesbian bigotry playing a big part in Penny's conviction, and is a case study of confirmation bias.

Several jurors, a full nine members, expressed disapproval of lesbian and gay relationships in jury questionnaires.

Police investigators questioned Penny's co-workers about her body language, 'how she carried herself at work;' her persona apparently appearing unladylike behavior in an atavistic conception of gender types.

From 2015:

Madison, Wisconsin media—WISC-TV (Madison), WKOW-TV(Madison)—and advocates for Brummer heavily covered the news of the $10,000 reward as a private investigator, Rikki Glen, continues an ongoing investigation

Rikki Glen, Penny's mother, Nancy Brummer, and John Pray of the Wisconsin Innocence Project held a press conference yesterday, (December 2015), in front of the Dane County Courthouse.

"The evidence [in the Brummer case] was beyond, beyond thin," said Ms. Glen at the press conference.

The reward for the 21-year old conviction in Brummer v. Wisconsin comes as Dane County has made strides in combating LGBTQ bigotry, and after the win-convictions-for-reason-of-advancing-careers dynamic in the legal community in Wisconsin and Dane County resulted in incarcerations that shamed the criminal justice system.

"Today, we are a more enlightened community than 20 years ago, and Nancy Brummer, and advocates are optimistic that champions for truth will come forward and our community, police and prosecutors will stand up for truth and free Penny Brummer," said Glen.

Said John Pray of the Wisconsin Innocence Project at the press conference: 

It's been over 20 years since Penny Brummer has been convicted of the murder of Sarah Gonstead. It's a very long time and it's been a very difficult 20 years for Penny, for the family, and for her friends and many supporters. In 1994 when Penny was convicted this country was at the beginning of a revolution in the criminal justice system. This revolution was brought about by the first uses of DNA which led to the formation of the Innocence movement. At that time, for the first time, we all became very aware of the indisputable fact that it is possible to convict people of serious crimes—murder, sex assaults—and be completely innocent. We've also learned that this happens a lot more than we are comfortable with and a lot more than we ever thought was possible. In the years since then, we've seen 100s of examples where DNA evidence has proved beyond any doubt the system has grievously erred and that the wrong person was in prison. A number of those people are from Wisconsin. Wisconsin is not immune from that. Some of those people served decades in prison before they were proved innocent. In many of those cases DNA led not only to the release of the innocent person but to the arrest and conviction of the actual murderer or the actual perpetrator who have, by the way, gone on to commit other serious crimes because they have been let free.

We learn from these exonerations what went wrong with the system. And for the most part it isn't because there are evil police and prosecutors who are trying to get it wrong. They're generally good people, they're trying to solve crimes and serve justice. But even when people are acting in good faith there are still many ways that things can go tragically wrong: Eyewitness identification is often unreliable. Witnesses' memories are prone to mistakes. Investigators can prematurely arrive at conclusions that are incorrect and then focus on information that supports those plots and conclusions and disregard other information that comes in that does not support those conclusions. That's a process called 'tunnel vision.' And it can and it does lead to conviction of the innocent. Penny's case features many of these same features.

Below is the statement on Penny Brummer read by private investigator, Rikki Glen at the press conference held yesterday:
I'm Rikki Glen, a Wisconsin licensed private investigator retained by advocates challenging the wrongful conviction of Penny Brummer.

I am going to read a short statement about why we are here today, followed by statements from Penny's mother, Nancy and John Pray from the UW Innocence Project.

If you have questions we will be glad to try and answer them after we have finished.

Twenty years ago, Penny Brummer was convicted of killing Sarah Gonstead despite no weapon, no forensic evidence, no motive, and no evidence of any kind tying Brummer to the undetermined crime scene. It has long been asserted that anti-lesbian bias played a large part in Penny's conviction.

When I was asked to help with this case, earlier this year, I had a vague recollection of what transpired. As I was reading through the police reports I was shocked and bothered by some of the things that I read.

For instance, there was an alternate suspect. After Penny dropped off Sarah she saw her talking with some people. Penny remembered seeing an old gray van with distinctive bug eye windows. A few days later, Penny was looking for the van when she spotted it not far from the 3054 Club and Taco Bell. Penny gave the license number to her friend's mother, who turned it over to police. The license traced back to a person who had a long record of felonies against women. He admitted he frequented the area where Penny saw him talking to Sarah, and he said that he was the only one who ever drove his vehicle. His driver's license was revoked at the time, so it was a crime for him to drive, but police didn't seem to notice that. He was interviewed briefly, told them he wasn't at that location on March 14th, and that ended the interview.

Police clearly had 'tunnel vision' in building a case against Penny, another common feature in wrongful convictions.

Another example a witness came forward and reported seeing a suspicious man standing by the open passenger door of a parked pickup truck exactly where Sarah's body was later found. This suspicious man matched the description of the person Penny said she saw Sarah talking to near the Taco Bell at East Washington Avenue and North Oak Street in Madison. He also noticed what looked to him to be a pink duffle bag on the ground next to the truck. Sarah was wearing a pink jacket when she disappeared. The police told the witness 'This is all very interesting, but we already have a suspect, and this doesn't fit.'

Today, I announce that a $10,000 reward has been established for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the killer of Sarah Gonstead. Advocates have set up a new toll-free number, (800) 407-1178, for tipsters seeking the $10,000 reward.

A decent and honest district attorney's office, we believe, will not defend this prosecution, because today we are a more enlightened community than 20 years ago, and Nancy Brummer, and advocates are optimistic that champions for truth will come forward and our community, police and prosecutors will stand up for truth and free Penny Brummer.
"Hope springs eternal in the human breast," said Alexander Pope in his An Essay on Man (1734). Hope for decency.

Sep 6, 2016

Wrongful Conviction: Penny Brummer Is Innocent and Still in Prison

Don't worry Penny, we'll keep up the edifying debate about how noble Dane County (Wisconsin) police really are amid 'mistakes' like Dane County throwing your life away.

From MC, Jan. 14, 2016

Penny Brummer - Wrongfully Convicted
by bigotry and police tunnel vision
Bigotry, police tunnel vision, police deceit, prosecutorial misconduct and the prison-industrial complex all suggest a criminal justice system gone way, way wrong.

Manitowoc, Wisconsin is one international focal point; Madison, Wisconsin is another.

Penny Brummer was convicted in 1995 for first degree intentional homicide and given a life sentence.

This is Madison, Wisconsin. The question advocates ask: Will a more enlightened community 20 years later give Ms. Brummer a new trial for a prosecution that should never have taken place?

That's really what advocates want because there is no chance in a million Brummer would be convicted today.

Bill Lueders has the story at Isthmus.

Writes Lueders:

Which brings us to Penny Brummer, convicted of the March 1994 murder of Sarah Gonstead, the best friend of Penny’s female ex-lover, after a night of barhopping. The case has all the hallmarks of wrongful conviction: No prior criminal history on Brummer’s part. No physical evidence tying her to the crime. No credible eyewitnesses, and one manifestly non-credible one. 

Which Dane County jurist will come forward and champion justice, and save the life of an innocent woman in the process?

Feb 23, 2016

Brooklyn, NY Woman’s Conviction Overturned after DA Revisits Old Homicide Cases

Penny Brummer - Wrongfully convicted in 1994
because she is a lesbian
New York — Brooklyn District Attorney Ken Thompson announced that he will move to vacate a second-degree manslaughter conviction from a 1998 jury trial, PIX11 has exclusively learned.

District Attorney Thompson said, "In the interest of justice, I will ask the Court today to vacate the manslaughter conviction of Vanessa Gathers. After a thorough and fair review of the case by my Conviction Review Unit and the Independent Review Panel, I have concluded that this conviction should not stand," Nicole Johnson of PIX-11 reports.

In the interest of justice.

This is a compelling reason to impose truth upon a miscarriage of justice.

Penny Brummer in Madison, Wisconsin

Locally, in Madison, Wisconsin if you have not signed the petition begun in January calling for a new trial for Penny Brummer, wrongfully convicted in 1994, please consider doing so now.

Ms. Brummer is an innocent woman railroaded by police tunnel vision, bigotry and a retrograde conception of lesbianism.

No evidence, no criminal record of Ms. Brummer who joined the U.S. Air Force straight out of high school, no motive, no connection to an unknown crime scene and an unknown murder weapon,  Brummer was nevertheless arrested, prosecuted and convicted of first degree intentional homicide of Sarah Gonstead.

Brummer reportedly wrote a letter earlier this month to Dane County (Wisconsin) District Attorney Ismael Ozanne asking for a new trial.

"Unless something does happen, Penny will die in a Wisconsin prison, damned for a relationship once forbidden in an era of intolerance," noted David Protess, President, Chicago Innocence Project, (Huffington Post).

DA Ozanne could call for a new trial today ... in the interest of justice.

To borrow from Robert H. Jackson's address 75 years ago, "While the prosecutor at his best is one of the most beneficent forces in our society, when he acts from malice or other base motives, he is one of the worst," (U.S. DoJ).

Feb 19, 2016

Alabama Lawmakers Propose Conviction Integrity Unit

Alabama, that's Al . a . bama has introduced legislation to review the integrity of felony convictions.

Reports Tim Lockette of the Anniston Star from Montgomery: A Republican member of the Alabama State Senate, (Sen. Dick Brewbaker, R-Montgomery), wants to create an Innocence Inquiry Commission to review felony convictions.

Time for my county, Dane County, to catch up to reformist Republican lawmakers in Alabama. Indeed, statewide, especially Milwaukee and Dane County, the need for conviction integrity units is clear, (Mal Contends).

Lots of talk behind the scenes among jurists of the necessity of an independent Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU) in Dane County enacted by the Dane County Board of Supervisors.

See Conviction Integrity Units: Vanguard of Criminal Justice Reform and An Epidemic of Prosecutor Misconduct, and the Innocence Project's Conviction Integrity Unit Best Practices for white papers.

Consider the cases from Dane County and the wrongful convictions such as Penny Brummer, and Forest Shomberg, and Ralph Armstrong, and Anthony Hicks, and Audrey Edmunds. These people had decades taken from the lives, and the toll on their families is incalculable.

An independent Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU) analyzing and providing recommendations to the District Attorney's office could have taken years off their wrongful sentences and returned these innocents to their families. CIU recommends X because of Y, Z. Easy to contemplate how facts and science would reveal the rush to judgement and tunnel vision all too common in law enforcement.

Consider Penny Brummer.

Any examination of the integrity of the 1994 conviction of Penny Brummer would lead to the exoneration of Ms. Brummer as there is literally no case against Brummer who was convicted anyway by a jury, most of whom were admitted homophobes.

If you have not signed the petition calling for a new trial, please do.

An observer of Ms. Brummer's case remarked if Wisconsin had a death penalty, the resulting necessary scrutiny of Brummer's case would have already led to her exoneration. Instead Brummer has fallen through the cracks of the criminal justice system, like an untold number of others.

Consider Dane County.

With the analytical resources available in the Dane County citizenry, staffing a Conviction Integrity Unit with retired jurists, scholars, students, journalists, intellectuals from labor, business and myriad other segments of the community, a low-cost check on the criminal justice system could result in avoiding tragedy. Finding CIU staff who would happily work for a stipend would be easy.

We must ask ourselves the question: How cheap are lives in Dane County?

"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice ... ."
 - U.S. v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982)

Feb 6, 2016

'Making a Murderer' Shines Light on Wrongful Convictions

Simon Booker at the Huntington Post notes the success of Making a Murderer has focused attention on the police-prosecutor-prison complex defining the American justice system.

The nearly daily reports of exonerations have seen 2015 record the most exonerations in American history.

But make no mistake the Blue Wall of Silence and careerism make wrongful convictions in America common and difficult to overcome, no matter how glaring the errors and injustice.

Readers here know this legal-political journal has worked locally in Madison, Wisconsin for a new trial for Penny Brummer, wrongfully convicted of first degree intentional homicide in 1994.

A petition for a new trial has begun quickly gathering 100s of signatures in the saturated social justice petition realm of the Internet.

The current District Attorney Ismael Ozanne (Dane County Wisconsin) knows fully well a new trial would result in a exoneration by Penny Brummer, yet refuses to stipulate to a new trial. Advocates await a response, an opportunity for Ozanne to stand up for truth and justice over convictions.

This will require moral courage, and decency.

Twenty years after Brummer's arrest and conviction no longer does being an out lesbian render an individual suspect, and garner dehumanization by prosecutors at trial.

Still, advocates expect this obstinate refusal of prosecutors and police to speak out against injustice.

A retired Madison Police Chief, David Couper writes me in response to a question about Brummer he is in "no position" to do anything, apparently forgetting that in America citizens are free to sign petitions, write letters, columns, contact their elected officials for a redress of grievances, and work with like-minded citizens to persuade the local District Attorney's office to stare truth in its face.

A growing number of advocates are looking askance at this I-don't-know, nothing-I-can-do posturing by retired police and active prosecutors as an innocent woman, whom reportedly even the prison guards have come to regard as wrongfully convicted, sees Year 21 behind bars.

Advocates await a champion to stand up for truth and are optimistic this year, for reasons I cannot explain here without breaking a confidence.

Dante Alighier wrote, the "hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality."

Norman Cohn termed neutrality, "passive compliance."

The consequences of passive compliance are catastrophic. Ask Penny Brummer.

Jan 28, 2016

'Prosecutors hell-bent on victory'

"Prosecutorial bias permeates the American judicial system. Prosecutors hell-bent on victory often directly or indirectly prod investigators and experts to get the results they want. It’s refreshing to see a judge recognize this in a well-reasoned, groundbreaking decision," notes Martin Yant commenting at the Wrongful Conviction blog.

The convictions-at-any-costs dynamic in American criminal justice has put away 1,000s of innocents across the country as character assassination becomes one element of the MO of prosecutors. The case Yant comments on is Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. George D. Perrot. See also the Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism.

For example, in Brummer v. Wisconsin, the (late) and disgraced assistant D.A. Judy Schwaemle said of the accused, Penny Brummer, at trial, "You are not judging a human being."

Such dehumanization is necessary for cases devoid of evidence. If you wish to sign a petition calling for a new trial for Penny Brummer in the name of justice, sign the petition here.

Brummer was arrested and convicted for one reason, she is an out lesbian, and Madison was not a safe place in the early 1990s for out lesbians, and in former DA Brian Blanchard's office, victory and conviction was the only consideration of the office's operation.

With respect to Mr. George Perrot, he spent 30 years in prison for a crime of which he is innocent. He remains in prison, pending the Hampton County (Mass) District Attorney's decision to appeal

No Massachusetts prosecutor stepped up to say the Perrot case is unjust and indecent. To do so would damage careers which is precisely what is occurring now in the fall-out of the Perrot exoneration and the outing of a rogue prosecutor, Francis W. Bloom formerly of the Hampton County (Mass) District Attorney's office.

Notes Yvonne Abraham of the Boston Globe, Perrot's advocates never quit:

Over the years, Perrot and his attorneys have tried many times to have his conviction overturned. Most recently, his case has been taken on by Kirsten Mayer and other attorneys from Ropes and Gray (LLP); The Innocence Project; and The Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism at Brandeis University. Until now, none of the egregious and appalling irregularities in this case has proved enough.

For Wisconsin's Penny Brummer and other innocents like George Perrot, never give up.

Jan 24, 2016

Notable Quotes from a Malicious Prosecution

Please sign Petition to demand new trial for wrongfully convicted Penny Brummer, convicted out of 1990s animus against lesbians by Dane County law enforcement, and tunnel vision.

"You are not judging a human being. [Sarah Gonstead] was killed by somebody who had an interest in seeing her dead. An interest that none of us can understand or fathom. An interest that none of us understand because we've never experienced anything like that. Tell the world what Penny Brummer did and find her guilty," said the (late) assistant D.A. Judy Schwaemle at trial in Brummer v.  Wisconsin (1994) (Dane County Case Number 1994CF000617), (Protess, Huffington Post).
-
"One of the questions on the jury sheet was, 'Do you believe that lesbianism is morally wrong?' And I would say a good 75 % of the people we interviewed said yes. But then the district attorneys, [prosecuting attorneys], would ask if they thought they could set aside their opinion of lesbians and judge the case just on the evidence, and they would say yes," said Penny Brummer, (Ingrid Ricks, The Advocate (1995)].
-
"Something's got to happen. God's not going to let me sit here for something I didn't do. I feel he's guiding somebody out there to help me," said Penny Brummer, (Lueders, (Isthmus, (2005)).
 -
"We must make the system more responsive to post-conviction claims of injustice and less bound by blind obedience to finality," (Wisconsin Innocence Project, Keith Findley, Washington Post (2016)).
 -
Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne

Dear Mr. Ozanne,

"I am writing this pro se (for the moment) and would like to respectfully request that you stipulate to a new trial in light of the paucity of the circumstantial case in Brummer v.  Wisconsin, (Dane County Case Number 1994CF000617)."

This request comes from the commonality we share that justice must guide the actions of the district attorney's office."
—Letter (Jan. 2016) from Penny Brummer asking for new trial

Jan 22, 2016

Why Prosecutors Go after Innocent People

Penny Brummer v. Wisconsin is test case of the integrity of Wisconsin's criminal justice system

"John Pfaff is a professor of law at the Fordham University School of Law in New York City. His research focuses on explaining the causes of mass incarceration, especially the central role prosecutors have played in the process," as noted in the Washington Post.

In one of Professor Pfaff's academic essays on empirical evidence at trial, Pfaff notes of the adversarial character of the trial process in American criminal law, "the US Supreme Court said in Tehan v United States, 383 US 406, 416 (1966), '[t]he basic purpose of a trial is the determination of truth,'" (Phaff, PrawfsBlawg).

This stated purpose is ironic to the 1,000s of wrongfully convicted Americans.

As it stands now, the purpose of the trial, the distribution of resources, and the culture of the prosecutor is to obtain as many convictions as possible, and for those charged and wrongfully convicted with decades-long sentence, well, that would be a Your Problem.

There are careers at stake, so innocents spending their lives incarcerated is not of the moment.

Exonerations, wrongful convictions, rampant Brady violations are met with anti-intellectualism among smug bureaucratic careerists and the Sovereign, the state as embodied in the American prosecutor, even as calls ring out across the country for "humility" and reform. And prosecutors are licensed to lie.

Professor Pfaff has a piece in the Post this week discussing why prosecutors go after innocent people, a phenomenon that does not trouble the body politic much unless the accused or investigated happens to be backed by the Koch brothers and other moneyed interests, Wisconsin's Scott Walker, for instance.

In Wisconsin even an investigation or audit is met with askance at best from the quasi-fascist Party now holding power.

In this week's Post, Praff writes:

Clearly, prosecutors do file charges against innocent defendants. The instances that receive media attention tend to be intentionally wrongful, those where the evidence of innocence is overwhelming but prosecutors storm ahead anyway, out of malice or blind ambition.

But I bet most wrongful convictions aren’t the product of such decisions. Prosecutors generally deal with ambiguous cases. What incentives do they face, when acting in good faith, to err on the side of 'safety' and file the charges vs. erring on the side of 'caution' and dropping the case? Locally elected prosecutors surely do think about innocence, and not just because they don’t want a wrongful conviction scandal to derail a reelection campaign, but there aren’t many restrictions keeping them from filing charges beyond increasingly weakened trial protections and personal ethics.

Prosecution in the United States is a highly local affair. Almost all criminal cases are handled by one of the nation’s approximately 2,400 prosecutor offices, and in 46 states these prosecutors are elected in county-level elections. While prosecutors almost always win their reelection campaigns and often run unopposed, electoral victory isn’t guaranteed. Data indicate that prosecutors running for reelection win 95 percent of the time, but only 69 percent of the time when facing opposition (although that rate rises to almost 80% in larger districts). And several people have reminded me that prosecutors are political creatures, and thus they are sensitive to electoral pressures even when victory seems assured.

So who applies this pressure?

Only a small group: Not very many people vote in these elections. In 2013, for example, a bitterly contested primary battle in Kings County, N.Y., resulted in barely 20 percent voter turnout. And in the 2012 general election in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, 34 percent of those who voted simply skipped voting for prosecutor altogether, despite being in the polling booth already.

Moreover, those who do vote tend to be wealthier, whiter and more suburban, while those who are prosecuted are disproportionately poor, minority and urban. Most cities, for example, are parts of bigger counties that include rings of wealthier suburbs. And these suburbs, as legal scholar William Stuntz has pointed out, tend to wield disproportionate power when it comes to prosecutor elections, even though crime is concentrated in the cities.

Thus the costs of wrongful convictions are disproportionately borne by the group with less political power, or at least a weaker political voice. (Urban minorities are also the biggest beneficiaries of effective crime-fighting by prosecutors, which makes their reduced political voice all the more troubling.)

In Wisconsin, an anthology of most everything that is wrong with the police-prosecutor state, this April 5 Election Day will likely see a 50-some percent turn-out for the open Wisconsin Supreme Court seat but this is because the Court election will be on the same ballot as the Presidential Preference Primary election.

Typically, the top appellate court in Wisconsin election will bring out 20-some percent of voters with candidates presenting their police and sheriffs' endorsements as credentials critical to impartial judicial scholarship on the bench in their political ads, as open corruption is now SOP on the Court.

At some point, when the Sovereign surpasses a tipping point, when a politically ambitious district attorney like Brian Blanchard (2001-2010) files a criminal charge against an eminent University of Wisconsin-Madison historian, Stanley Kutler (1934-2015), the slow-reacting political system will begin to ask what the hell is going on.

Jan 21, 2016

On Wrongful Convictions and Tunnel Vision

"Only a fraction of criminal cases involve biological evidence that can be subjected to DNA testing, and even when such evidence exists, it is often lost or destroyed after a conviction. Since they don’t have access to a definitive test like DNA, many wrongfully convicted people have a slim chance of ever proving their innocence," notes the Innocence Project.

The criminal justice is a system of men and women, and not law; don't kid yourself. High-minded rhetoric from prosecutors is so much twaddle.

For justice to prevail, commitment to truth and moral courage must trump careerism, institutional inertia of the drive to amass convictions, and passive compliance.

So, I pose here again an appeal to sign and distribute this Petition to demand a new trial for the wrongfully convicted Penny Brummer, convicted out of 1990s animus against lesbians by Dane County law enforcement, tunnel vision, and a frighteningly hostile stance of district attorneys toward claims of injustice and "blind obedience to finality," (Findley, Innocence Project, Washington Post).

Following is an eloquent description of Tunnel Vision from the Huffington Post, (Ferner):

Tunnel Vision: 'A Recipe For Disaster'

During the course of 'Making a Murderer,' it’s revealed that Manitowoc authorities had evidence that there may have been another suspect in Avery’s sexual assault case. For years, though, no report was filed about that evidence. Avery’s defense argues that law enforcement, in both Avery’s sexual assault case and his murder case, simply decided he was guilty before they had the evidence to prove it. The cops and prosecutors deny they had anything against Avery, maintaining that the evidence led them to him.

Daniel Medwed, a law professor at Northeastern University who has studied this phenomenon in depth, told HuffPost that police and prosecutors have been known to lock on to a theory and 'neglect countervailing evidence' if they decide a certain individual must be guilty.

'Psychologists call this "confirmation bias," Medwed said. 'After you develop a hypothesis, you see everything through that lens and interpret data in a way that confirms that view.'

[U.S. Circuit Judge Alex] Kozinski echoed similar sentiments to HuffPost, saying that when police are convinced of a person's guilt, this kind of 'tunnel vision' is 'probably the number one cause of wrongful convictions.'

This month, The Police Chief, the magazine of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, published an extensive report describing how 'tunnel vision' can lead to overturned convictions.

'This heuristic is particularly ill-suited to solving complex, dynamic investigations,' writes Dr. Kim Rossmo, a university chair and former detective inspector. 'Focusing on the first likely suspect, then closing the investigation off to alternative theories is a recipe for disaster.'
Yes, 'tunnel vision is a recipe for disaster, ask Penny Brummer. Of the many victims of tunnel vision, let's save one.

The Police Chief's piece on tunnel vision concludes:

Investigations should be led by the evidence, not by the suspects. Case conclusions should be deferred until sufficient information has been gathered, and tunnel vision should be avoided at all costs. Investigative managers must remain neutral and encourage open inquiries, discussion, and dissent. Assumptions, inference chains, and uncertainties need to be recognized and recorded. Outside help should be sought when necessary.

Being aware of these problems, however, is usually not enough. Police agencies need to establish organizational mechanisms to mitigate their risk.

Yes, like that's going to happen. There are careers at stake, Penny Brummer is suffering her wrongful conviction and life sentence for the sake of these careers and reputations.

Jan 20, 2016

Wisconsin Innocents Remain Incarcerated, Two L.A. Men to Get $24 million for Wrongful Convictions

Brummer v. Wisconsin
Updated - See also piece at CounterPunch.

"Los Angeles will pay more than $24 million to two men wrongfully imprisoned for decades, settling lawsuits by the men that accused police detectives of ignoring key evidence or witness testimony in the separate murderer cases," reports Dakota Smith in Los Angeles Daily News.

The headlines reporting new exonerations across the nation are almost daily. And the reactions from prosecutors across the country are uniform: Nothing to see here, no systemic problems, nothing we could have done, good faith, all systems green in the American criminal justice system.

With respect to the 1994 wrongful conviction of Penny Brummer in Dane County Wisconsin, I'm starting to believe the obstacles behind the district attorney's refusal to stipulate to a new trial is not a combination of institutional arrogance, obstinance and careerism.

No, Dane County District Attorney Ismael R. Ozanne has to this point refused a new trial in the Brummer case because he is protecting a wrongful conviction begun with an animus towards lesbians, and the case at trial was virtually a string of defamations, character assassinations and suppositions made in open court by the two prosecutors, the retired Ann Sayles, (27 years as a prosecutor in the DA's Office) and the late Deputy District Attorney Judy Schwaemle. See Who Killed Sarah.

Ozanne must believe he owes his allegiance to his former colleagues whose names are of more importance than the life of Penny Brummer.

There is no chance Brummer would be convicted today at trial, so Ozanne, one speculates, made a calculation that an innocent woman's life is not worth the black eye the DA's office would incur and the substantial monies that would be paid out by the state of Wisconsin.

There is a darker more sinister explanation: Brady violations, that would constitute prosecutorial misconduct.

I asked Ozanne a series of questions when he was running for Wisconsin attorney general in 2014, One question in part is "how much does the imprisonment of an innocent weigh on you?"

The relevant portion of Ozanne's response (via email) is below:

No prosecutor should want to have innocent people who have been wrongfully convicted stay in prison.  If evidence is brought to the attention of the authorities demonstrating that a mistake has been made, the interests of justice demand that the evidence is carefully reviewed and the individual should be released if exonerated. As Dane County District Attorney, I have worked with lawyers from the Innocence Project, and will do so in the future.  While these decisions are largely at the discretion of the DAs around the state, I would work with them as attorney general, providing resources and advice in these situations. The ultimate goal of the system is not simply to secure convictions, it is to do justice, (Mal Contends, April 2104) (emphasis added)

If Ozanne really believes his reference to "justice," I fully expect a review of Brummer v. Wisconsin (1994) (Dane County Case Number 1994CF000617) and a new trial.

Because the feeble, circumstantial case against Brummer should have been laughed out of court by former Judge Patrick Fiedler in 1994, Ozanne would be subjecting his office to ridicule, contingent on his position.

Notes attorney Sheila Berry:

All of the Signs of Innocence, criteria developed by David Protess, Director of the Chicago Innocence Project, apply to Penny.

Physical Evidence?
No physical evidence tied Penny to the crime; the murder weapon was never found.

Credible eye witnesses?
Key witnesses included James Foseid, who changed his story several times (and continues to change it).

Alibis?
Penny was home in Spring Green in time to see a TV show that started at 1:37 a.m. Sarah, forensic evidence suggests, may not have died until several hours later.

Any credible confession?
Penny maintains her innocence, although a police detective claimed she nodded slightly when he stated, "I think you were involved in Sarah's death."

Background of defendant?
No prior criminal record.

Enough pussyfooting around, Ismael Ozanne. Is your stated dedication to justice straight-up?

On Feb. 21, 2014 Rubin 'Hurricane' Carter (1937-2014), facing his imminent death, published his dying wish: That David McCallum of Brooklyn be granted a full hearing by the Brooklyn conviction integrity unit, (Carter, New York Daily News).

"I ask [District Attorney Ken] Thompson to look straight in the eye of truth, a tougher customer than death, and not back down either," wrote Carter. McCallum's 1986 conviction for murder and kidnapping was vacated in October 2014, (Moynihan, NYT), some six months after Rubin Carter died on April 20.

One hopes a similar legal result awaits Penny Brummer so that this woman who has over 20 years taken away from her can live out her life in peace.

Jan 18, 2016

Conviction Integrity from St. Clair County Illinois to Dane County

News from this weekend comes from St. Clair County, Illinois.

This southwestern county in Illinois was not a place on my radar screen, for anything. It is now.

George Pawlaczyk and Beth Hundsdorfer report in the Belleville News-Democrat (Illinois) a new Conviction Integrity unit begun in 2013 as a check on wrongful prosecutions and wrongful convictions has already exonerated a full nine people.

"[N]ine defendants accused in eight cases have been freed in prosecutions that involved murder, armed robbery, predatory criminal sexual assault, reckless homicide, possession of a weapon by a felon and felony retail theft," note Pawlaczyk and Hundsdorfer.

Nine more innocents exonerated from a county roughly half as populous as Dane County Wisconsin in some two years.

As Wisconsin (and the nation) comes to grips with the fact police routinely lie, coerce innocents and cook reports, prosecutors' prime objective remains to achieve statistics of convictions over truth. Reforms in district attorney's offices are as common as a 50-degree January day in Wisconsin, and the question arises what is to be done.

The criminal justice sensation chronicling the moral and legal disgrace in Manitowoc County Wisconsin, Making of Murderer, has provoked a reaction among law enforcement jurists.

This reaction from Wisconsin law enforcement, I'm told, is one of smug arrogance, inappropriate from the prosecutorial offices holding so much power over the liberty of American citizens in a Constitutional democracy.

Then again most jurists don't become prosecutors to serve the citizenry, and the district attorney's office is not a fountain of soul-searching intellectuals who stay up nights pondering what went wrong when another innocent is exonerated after losing decades of his or her life.

This isn't grade school, folks: Let's acclaim a truism, the district attorney's office (or the state's attorney's office) is typically a stepping stone to enhance a legal career; maybe a lucrative position as a partner in as a defense attorney in a mid-sized firm, (unless your were drummed out of office like the fetid, ethics-free Ken Kratz who runs a small firm exiled up north in Superior, Wisconsin) or maybe a cushy, tax payer-financed judgeship awaits.

Dane County's Penny Brummer

In Dane County, readers are familiar with the wrongful conviction of Penny Brummer, as the Innocence Project, journalists, jurists, scholars and advocates know well this woman is innocent and they cannot, to this point, get Ms. Brummer out of prison, much less exonerate her. No evidence plus no motive equals no justice for Penny Brummer, but hey, she is a lesbian and served in the military right out of high school. By the way, please consider signing this new petition RE getting Ms. Brummer a new trial.

The reason Brummer remains in prison, to be candid, is the obstinance of the district attorney's office, and the absence of an independent county Conviction Integrity Unit.

Considering the analytical resources in Dane County and the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Frank J. Remington Center, there is every citizen resource in place to draft a mission statement, policies and procedures, criteria and scope of an independent Conviction Integrity Unit as a check on wrongful prosecutions and convictions in Dane County such as Penny Brummer, and Forest Shomberg, and Ralph Armstrong, and Anthony Hicks, and Audrey Edmunds, perhaps you notice a pattern forming: These are human beings. And this is just a partial list in Dane County where being exonerated is very difficult and takes a lot of luck along with the dedication of the Innocence Project, for example.

Most of the growing number of Conviction Integrity units across America are part of the district attorney's office and their efficacy is under debate.

But in St. Clair County, Illinois, State's Attorney Brendan Kelly's Conviction Integrity unit works before conviction and a case's inception into Conviction Integrity protocol is begun at the request of defense attorneys to the state's attorney.

No reason Dane County cannot establish a Conviction Integrity Unit, independent from the district attorney's office, and staff it with retired jurists, journalists, students and other scholars.

Ask Brummer, Shomberg, Armstrong, Hicks, and Edmunds (and an untold number other citizens) if this might be a good idea.

To end on a positive note, $16.8 Million was awarded by the State of Connecticut to four wrongfully convicted men last week. Good thing those guys don't live in Manitowoc County, or Dane County.

"The quest for a conviction cannot outweigh the Constitution rights of an accused," wrote Commissioner J. Paul Vance, Jr., Claims Commissioner of the State of Connecticut.

Dare to dream.

Jan 17, 2016

Petition Begun to Free Penny Brummer of Madison, Wisconsin

Penny Brummer - Wrongfully Convicted
A petition has begun by advocates to free the wrongfully convicted Penny Brummer of Madison, Wisconsin.

Penny Brummer was convicted in the 1994 murder of Sarah Gonstead despite no weapon, no forensic evidence, no motive, and literally no evidence of any kind tying Brummer to the undetermined crime scene. It has long been asserted that bigotry against lesbians in law enforcement investigators and among the jurors played a big part in Ms. Brummer's prosecution and conviction.

The petition follows the announcement in December of a $10,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the murderer of Ms. Gonstead.

The petition at Change.org reads:

From Friends of Penny Brummer:

New Trial for Penny Brummer, Wrongfully Convicted
Friends of Penny Brummer


Penny Brummer of Madison, Wisconsin was wrongfully convicted of first degree intentional homicide in the 1994 murder of Sarah Gonstead.

Whereas the last 20 years have seen a sea change in public attitudes with respect to sexual orientation; criminal justice findings on eyewitness testimony have shown its diminished reliability; tunnel vision defined the police investigation; and 20 years have passed highlighting the frail circumstantial case resulting in the wrongful conviction of Penny Brummer, showing a reasonable person cannot find the presented trial evidence strong enough to exclude to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis of the defendant's innocence, we the undersigned request:

1. Dane County District Attorney Ismael R. Ozanne move to vacate the 1995 wrongful conviction of Ms. Brummer and stipulate to a new trial.

2. A declarative statement from the Dane County District Attorney that Ms. Brummer's wrongful conviction be vacated in the name of justice, administering justice being an element of the oath of office that all Wisconsin district attorneys take upon assuming their duties.

The law can afford to be and must be just.

Jan 16, 2016

UW Innocence Project in Washington Post: Justice System Is Flawed, Error-prone

Update: The District Attorney's office from a Wisconsin county up north from which I obtained the district attorneys' oath is contradicted by a subsequent email and the Dept of Administration's (DoA) email which, citing statute, point out the Wisconsin DAs' oath reads: "I, the undersigned, who have been elected to the office of District Attorney of ____________________ County, but have not yet entered upon the duties thereof, swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Wisconsin, and will faithfully discharge the duties of said office to the best of my ability. So help me God."
 ---
Keith A. Findley, co-director of the Wisconsin Innocence Project at the University of Wisconsin Law School, has a column critical to Wisconsin jurists of good faith, intellectual honesty and "humility" in the Washington Post this weekend.

Findley's column should be read by every Wisconsin prosecutor, as should the district attorneys' oath of office, particularly, the clause reading, "that I will administer justice without respect, [meaning with no prejudice] to persons ... ," [Wisconsin Statute 757.02, regarding oath of office for justices and judges, typically borrowed for use of the oath of office for district attorneys].

Writes Findley:
[W]hile most police, prosecutors, defense lawyers and judges are good, honest people who do their best to achieve justice, they do sometimes fail and even, on occasion, cross the line into misconduct in their zeal to secure what they perceive to be a just outcome.

Wrongful conviction doesn’t only mean an innocent person ends up in prison. It also means a guilty person goes free. When the system fails, there is no justice for victims and their loved ones.

We have known for decades that the system is prone to error. Since the advent of forensic DNA testing in the late 1980s, at least 337 people, who each have spent an average of 14 years in prison, have been proved innocent by DNA evidence. According to the National Registry of Exonerations hosted by the University of Michigan Law School, exonerations based on all types of evidence, not just DNA, amount to at least 1,728 people who have been exonerated of serious crimes since 1989. The number is continually growing.

By presenting these issues in human terms, 'Making a Murderer' has done a service by forcing us to look beyond the numbers to remind us that each such case is a real human tragedy that affects real people with real lives. It reminds us that eyewitnesses sometimes make mistakes, that forensic science is not always all that scientific, and that, contrary to what a prosecutor in the [Brendan] Dassey trial disingenuously told the jury, innocent people do indeed sometimes confess.

Concludes Findley with numerous solutions, writing in part: "We must make the system more responsive to post-conviction claims of injustice and less bound by blind obedience to finality."

To translate for the lay reader, no district attorney should ever protect a conviction that he knows incarcerates an innocent woman, or a conviction that clearly fails the burden of beyond-a-reasonable-doubt-to-a-moral-certainty.

When our system comes to that, we are no longer a country of laws, we have become what Glenn C. Loury aptly terms a "leviathan."

To borrow from Robert H. Jackson's address 75 years ago, "While the prosecutor at his best is one of the most beneficent forces in our society, when he acts from malice or other base motives, he is one of the worst," (U.S. DoJ).

Jan 14, 2016

Penny Brummer Wrongful Conviction Penetrating Consciousness

Penny Brummer - Wrongfully Convicted
by bigotry and police tunnel vision
Bigotry, police tunnel vision, police deceit, prosecutorial misconduct and the prison-industrial complex all suggest a criminal justice system gone way, way wrong.

Manitowoc, Wisconsin is one international focal point; Madison, Wisconsin is another.

Penny Brummer was convicted in 1995 for first degree intentional homicide and given a life sentence.

This is Madison, Wisconsin. The question advocates ask: Will a more enlightened community 20 years later give Ms. Brummer a new trial for a prosecution that should never have taken place?

That's really what advocates want because there is no chance in a million Brummer would be convicted today.

Bill Lueders has the story at Isthmus.

Writes Lueders:

Which brings us to Penny Brummer, convicted of the March 1994 murder of Sarah Gonstead, the best friend of Penny’s female ex-lover, after a night of barhopping. The case has all the hallmarks of wrongful conviction: No prior criminal history on Brummer’s part. No physical evidence tying her to the crime. No credible eyewitnesses, and one manifestly non-credible one. 

Which Dane County jurist will come forward and champion justice, and save the life of an innocent woman in the process?

Dec 22, 2015

On Wrongful Convictions and Penny Brummer

Updated - Here is a strong recommendation for Christmas weekend binge watching: The Making of a Murderer (Ricciardi and Demos, Netflix). Wisconsin viewers will recognize many of the players, the chilling police and prosecutor duplicity, the cover-ups, the lies, and the pathological lack of conscience of Wisconsin law enforcement. Raves are pouring in, this is a masterpiece that ought to shake the foundations of the state criminal law system. It won't.
 --
Wrapping up for Christmas Day weekend early, we note here again the findings of the first, systematic empirical study on actual innocence, wrongful convictions and exonerations.

"Police and prosecutors maintain their roles ... serving as the largest combined source of opposition to exonerations," conclude Jon B. Gould and Richard A. Leo in their important Path to Exoneration research paper.

Noted here at this site and across the Madison, Wisconsin press has been the case study of a wrongful conviction: Penny L. Brummer v. Wisconsin (Dane County Case Number 1994CF000617) (1994).

Standing in the way of exoneration are the police and the District Attorney's office.

There have been numerous exonerations in Wisconsin and in Dane County, (Wisconsin Innocence Project) and only a fool can doubt more innocent people remain behind bars today.

Yet, as we read of the exoneration of one Wisconsin citizen after another (Barton, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel), there is not widespread outrage from jurists, no public demand for accountability from the police and prosecutors, no call for change in the police-prosecutor state about which the prescient 20th century jurist (and chief prosecutor for the Allied Forces at Nuremberg), Robert H. Jackson, warned our country about 75 years ago.

Instead, we find local police and prosecutors serving as the largest combined source of opposition to exonerations, and as eager foes of liberty.

To Penny Brummer and many other victims, please note in this holiday season: You are not forgotten.

As for Dane County Wisconsin, one step should be the establishment of a Conviction Integrity Unit independent of the District Attorney's office (acting in an advisory capacity) that can serve as a political check on cases such as the shabby investigation, the retrograde bigotry, passive compliance and careerism of law enforcement that caused Penny Brummer to serve year 21 now of a life sentence for an alleged homicide of which I believe prosecutors, police and many others know she is innocent.

To state what should be obvious: The careers of law enforcement officials are trivial in comparison to the life and liberty of the Wisconsin citizenry.

Looking for justice in Wisconsin—Penny Brummer

Nov 9, 2015

Wrongful Conviction—$10,000 Reward Offered in Sarah Gonstead Killing; Innocent Penny Brummer Still in Prison

Wrongful Conviction for Reasons of Careerism and Bigotry Against Lesbians 
"They didn't look at (Penny), they just looked at it as let's get another gay person off the street," said Nancy Brummer, Penny's mother (Pabich, WMTV-TV) -

Updated - As Penny Brummer remains in prison, convicted for the 1994 killing of Sarah Gonstead, a $10,000 reward is now being offered for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person(s) responsible for 1994 death of Gonstead and Kelly Nolan.

Tipsters may remain anonymous. Email sheila0326@gmail.com, or call toll-free at 800 407-1178.

Penny Brummer's 1994 conviction remains an outrage perpetrated by the Madison Police Dept, the Dane County Sheriff's Dept., and the Dane County District Attorney's office still protecting the wrongful conviction to this day.

Penny Brummer

Here in Dane County, an innocent woman, Penny Brummer, remains behind bars (in Fond du Lac county), a 1994 prosecution presided over by District Attorney Brian Blanchard's office (2001-2010), and an injustice District Attorney Ismael Ozanne (2010-present) has refused to revisit, though the case lacks evidence of any kind—forensic evidence, crime scene eyewitness accounts, murder weapons, nothing but bigotry and what attorneys call "confirmation bias."

So what happened in 1994? The D.A.'s office says: There's no case?

Brummer was a lesbian and veteran so she likely murdered someone, and police had a theory, who needs evidence?

The judge was former Dane County (Wisconsin) Judge Patrick Fiedler, now a partner with Hurley, Burish & Stanton, S.C., after several decades of prosecutorial work in service to the Republican Party and his career. Fiedler, a rightwinger and typical bigot, agreed with the D.A's office.

A decent judge would have dismissed the case.

It is incomprehensible to me why current DA Ismael Ozanne lets this injustice stand.

"Police clearly had 'tunnel vision' in building a case against Penny, another common feature in wrongful convictions. Witness David Zoromski, who reported seeing a suspicious man standing by the open passenger door of a parked pickup truck exactly where Sarah's body was later found, was told by a Dane County Sheriff's Deputy, 'What you saw is all very interesting, but we have a suspect and it doesn't fit.' The man seen by Mr. Zoromski matched the description of the person Penny said she saw Sarah talking to near the Taco Bell at East Washington Avenue and North Oak Street in Madison, after she dropped her off that night. Police identified him and knew he was a convicted felon with a long history of violence toward women -- but they never followed up on this lead."
- From Who Killed Sarah

To support this innocent woman, see Penny Brummer.