Update: See Ernest A. Canning excellent analysis on the Brad Blog. "The state," the Veasey petition argues, "has no interest in --- and the public certainly has no interest --- in enforcing intentionally discriminatory laws." The DoJ adds to the weight of that argument by pointing to the District Court's findings as to how, in the face of demographic changes that threaten to reduce white Anglo Texans to minority status, each successive Photo ID bill enacted by the state became increasingly restrictive of minority voting rights --- with SB 14 having been passed "with 'unnatural speed' over the objection of legislators who represented predominantly non-white districts," and that "the Texas Legislature had rejected a 'litany of ameliorative amendments' that would have softened SB 14's impact on minority voters."
Republicans were dealt a body blow in their efforts to block voters in Wisconsin last week.
How are Republicans supposed to win if they can't block voters and gerrymander districts?
Next up is Texas which has an even more restrictive Voter ID law than Wisconsin's.
In Texas the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit imposed this onerous Voter ID law even closer to Election Day than did the Seventh Circuit on Sept. 12 (before this decision was vacated).
"On October 9, U.S. District Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos struck down
Texas’s harsh photo ID law, ruling after a lengthy trial that the Texas
legislature enacted the law to purposely discriminate against minority
voters," notes the Brennan Center.
Plaintiffs' emergency application against the Texas ID law and others are being heard by Justice Scalia.
The U.S. Dept of Justice has also filed an application.
The case is Veasey v. Perry (No 14A393). The state of Texas' response is due Thursday at 5 pm.
An array of civil rights groups and the US Dept of Justice against Texas.