Michael Moore's New Film

Few areas of policy have the potential to erupt and capture the American imagination during campaign season as the bailout of the banks and financial institutions.

Visceral populist outrage is a political operative's dream.

At whom will this outrage be directed?

President Obama has resisted for several reasons the naming of names and demands for accountability from specific parties as his administartion has literally saved the world from a depression.

Can one new film by Michael Moore change the political landscape? Yes.

Moore is a brilliant political journalist and filmmaker with an unusual aptitude for understanding American political culture.

Accountability and the naming of names will be demanded and Moore's film, coming to theaters October 2, may well be the impetus

Watch for a qualitative difference in the political culture, demands for the naming of names "supplied by [Treasury Secretary Timothy] Geithner, identifying the criminally negligent, arrogant speculators."

'Save our CEOs' Teaser for Michael Moore's New Film Hits Theaters!

TNR Profiles Dr. Doom

The New Republic has a profile on Nouriel Roubini, "the economist known to the general public as Dr. Doom, Prophet of the Financial Apocalypse," by Julia Ioffe.

Though he hasn't attacked the Obama administration's policies with Paul Krugman's fury, and though he is no longer the most bearish of the bears, his short-term outlook is still quite bleak: a 36-month downturn, double-digit unemployment, and sluggish, recessionary growth well into 2010. ...

Roubini understood better than anyone just how weak the fundamentals of our economy were. The day after the now-famous 2006 IMF talk, he went on 'Kudlow & Company,' on CNBC. Roubini was, as always, the foil to Kudlow's chipperness. 'All my friends are in a great mood, Nouriel. They're in a terrific mood. They love America,' Kudlow sang. Roubini countered starkly: 'Well, they're all rich,' he said. 'The average American actually is in debt'--a sign to Roubini that housing would only be the catalyst of something larger.

Stiglitz Is Coming to Town

Update: A reader recommends a March piece by Paul Krugman in which he blasts the bank bailout plan. "But Treasury is still clinging to the idea that this is just a panic attack, and that all it needs to do is calm the markets by buying up a bunch of troubled assets. Actually, that’s not quite it: the Obama administration has apparently made the judgment that there would be a public outcry if it announced a straightforward plan along these lines, so it has produced what Yves Smith calls 'a lot of bells and whistles to finesse the fact that the government will wind up paying well above market ... .'"

Next Tuesday's (May 19) Joint Economic Committee (JEC) hearing will hear testimony by Nobel Laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz.

Stiglitz is widely admired for his book (co-authored with Linda J. Bilmes), The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict, putting a price tag on the obscene Bush-Cheney-Rice lie that continues to kill to this day.

That's the thing about Nobel Laureates. They often feel free and obliged to tell the hard, unvarnished truth.

To give you an idea of what Stiglitz will say on the economy, consider his commentary in The Spring of the Zombies, excerpted below after this political aside.
---
No one envies the Obama administration's task to revitalize after 20 years of neo-liberal/neo-conservative globalization, offshoring of jobs, and facilitation of financial speculators.

But Obama's resort to Bushian secrecy on matters ranging from the bank bailout plan to photos of American torture victims does not inspire confidence, much less reassurance that our president is on the same team as we.

An unprecedented number of Americans (myself included) worked to get Obama into the White House; and America still suffers from eight years of a genuinely hostile force in the White House.

We expect better from Obama. In so many words: You don't lie to a man who just got out of the can.

We are either in this together or we are not

Obama's refusal to provide the pubic with details on the mysterious creation of Zombie banks and the censorship of the black art of American torture makes everyone wonder about the nature of the man in charge.

The audacity of opacity is not the message that any administration should be sending to American citizens especially now. It's a tremendous mistake.
---
From Stiglitz:

(E)xamine the fundamentals: in America, real estate prices continue to fall, millions of homes are underwater, with the value of mortgages exceeding the market price, and unemployment is increasing, with hundreds of thousands reaching the end of their 39 weeks of unemployment insurance. States are being forced to lay off workers as tax revenues plummet.

The banking system has just been tested to see if it is adequately capitalized – a ‘stress’ test that involved no stress – and some couldn’t pass muster. But, rather than welcoming the opportunity to recapitalize, perhaps with government help, the banks seem to prefer a Japanese-style response: we will muddle through.

‘Zombie’ banks – dead but still walking among the living – are, in Ed Kane’s immortal words, ‘gambling on resurrection.’ Repeating the Savings & Loan debacle of the 1980’s, the banks are using bad accounting (they were allowed, for example, to keep impaired assets on their books without writing them down, on the fiction that they might be held to maturity and somehow turn healthy). Worse still, they are being allowed to borrow cheaply from the United States Federal Reserve, on the basis of poor collateral, and simultaneously to take risky positions. ...

In earlier crises, as in East Asia a decade ago, recovery was quick, because the affected countries could export their way to renewed prosperity. But this is a synchronous global downturn. America and Europe can’t export their way out of their doldrums.

Fixing the financial system is necessary, but not sufficient, for recovery. America’s strategy for fixing its financial system is costly and unfair, for it is rewarding the people who caused the economic mess. But there is an alternative that essentially means playing by the rules of a normal market economy: a debt-for-equity swap.

With such a swap, confidence could be restored to the banking system, and lending could be reignited with little or no cost to the taxpayer. It’s neither particularly complicated nor novel. Bondholders obviously don’t like it – they would rather get a gift from the government. But there are far better uses of the public’s money, including another round of stimulus.

Every downturn comes to an end. The question is how long and deep this downturn will be. In spite of some spring sprouts, we should prepare for another dark winter: it’s time for Plan B in bank restructuring and another dose of Keynesian medicine.

Joseph E. Stiglitz, Professor of Economics at Columbia University, chairs a Commission of Experts, appointed by the President of the UN General Assembly, on reforms of the international monetary and financial system. A new global reserve currency system is discussed in his 2006 book, Making Globalization Work.

Krugman Blasts Bank Execs

I wish the Obama administration would ask for Krugman's resignation at the Times, and put this guy in charge of the economic recovery.

From Krugman:

On July 15, 2007, The New York Times published an article with the headline 'The Richest of the Rich, Proud of a New Gilded Age.' The most prominently featured of the “new titans” was Sanford Weill, the former chairman of Citigroup, who insisted that he and his peers in the financial sector had earned their immense wealth through their contributions to society. ...

All of which explains why we should be disturbed by an article in Sunday’s Times reporting that pay at investment banks, after dipping last year, is soaring again — right back up to 2007 levels. Why is this disturbing? Let me count the ways.

Geithner Sounding Alarm

Update: NYT: "Despite huge government efforts to restore lending to normal, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner said Tuesday that borrowing costs remained high and credit was still not flowing normally."

Watch Treasury Secretary's Geithner at: http://www.cspan.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx

Geithner said there were "systematic failures" requiring very, very serious reforms.

Could Be a Bad Week

An update on the Obama's Project: Making Thin Ice Safe column.

The Dow dropped 289 points today from 8,131 (3.56%). And Mike Whitney has a new piece, Housing Bust Comes Roaring Back, Worse Than Ever in CounterPunch that reads like a horror book: "Market analysts predict there will be 5 million more foreclosures between now and 2011. Soaring unemployment and rising foreclosures ensure that hundreds of banks and financial institutions will be forced into bankruptcy. ... Another 20 percent carved off the aggregate value of US housing means another $4 trillion loss to homeowners. That means smaller retirement savings, less discretionary spending, and lower living standards. The next leg down in housing will be excruciating; every sector will feel the pain. Obama's $75 billion mortgage rescue plan is a mere pittance; it won't reduce the principle on mortgages and it won't stop the bleeding. Policymakers have decided they've done enough and refuse to lift a finger to help. They don't see the tsunami looming in front of them plain as day. The housing market is going under and it's going to drag a good part of the broader economy along with it. Stocks, too."