Showing posts with label chris matthews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chris matthews. Show all posts

Dec 6, 2013

Obama Promises Action on Discriminatory Voter ID Laws in Hardball Interview

President Obama is interviewed by Chris Matthews for his show
Hardball on MSNBC at American University in Washington DC.,
Dec. 5, 2013.- Photo by Charles Ommanney for MSNBC
President Obama did an one-on-one interview with Chris Matthews on MSNBC's Hardball before news broke that the world lost a human rights icon in Nelson Mandela's passing.

Lost in the news is Obama's response to a question on Voter ID and GOP voter suppression during the interview.

Obama offered a response that appears to offer assurance that the administration is going to pursue a strong political and legal attack against illegal GOP voter obstruction.

Said Obama, "Keep in mind though, for all the efforts that have been made, and some of them by the way may be illegal, may violate the Voting Rights Act even after the Supreme Court's recent ruling, and our Justice Department is going to be staying on them if we have evidence that you have mechanisms that are specifically designed to discriminate against certain groups of voters. Then, the Justice Department will come down on them and file suit."

A Twitter question appeared on screen and was read aloud by Matthews:

C.Wilhams@Persistentvoice

What can we do to stop the #GOP from rigging the vote state by state to disenfranchise voters (and) destroy our democracy?

Chris Matthews

Thirty-six states right now, led by Republican legislatures, have been trying to make it difficult for minority people to vote especially in big cities, and (with) older people. Everybody knows the game; Republicans often admit the game—to deny people the vote. Well, what's your reaction?

Barack Obama

A couple of things. You saw the lines that we had, not only in 08 but then in 12, some of these folks might have stood in line. And, I said on election night, that's unacceptable in a democracy that has been around as long as ours' and that the world looks to.

So, we actually immediately assigned my chief election lawyer and Mitt Romney's chief election lawyer to sit down with a group of experts and come up with a whole series of voter reforms. They're supposed to report back to me by the end of this year, so that early next year we're going to put forward what we know will be a bipartisan effort, or a bipartisan proposal, to encourage people to vote.

You can't say you take pride in American democracy, American Constitutionalism, American exceptionalism, and then you're doing everything you can to make harder for people to vote as opposed to easier for people to vote.

So, I think there are some common sense things that we can do, and I won't preview the proposals because I haven't gotten them yet.

Keep in mind though, for all the efforts that have been made, and some of them by the way may be illegal, may violate the Voting Rights Act even after the Supreme Court's recent ruling, and our Justice Department is going to be staying on them if we have evidence that you have mechanisms that are specifically designed to discriminate against certain groups of voters. Then, the Justice Department will come down on them and file suit.

The one point I want to make though is that even with all the efforts that were made, let's say in the last election, folks still voted.

And, if people feel engaged enough and have a sense of a stake in our democracy, you'll be able to vote. Our biggest problem right now is not the misguided efforts of some of these state legislators. Our bigger problem is the one you alluded to earlier, which is people's skepticism that government in fact can make a difference.

Even in the best of years these days we still have about 40 percent of the population who is eligible to vote that chooses to opt out. And they're not being turned away at the polls, they're turning themselves away from the polls. That's something we've got to get at, and young people in particular have a tendency to vote during presidential years and then just are not excited at all during mid-terms. These mid-term elections in many ways are even more important because that is what is going to determine who's in charge of Congress, and you may agree with me or disagree with me but don't think that it all ends with me.

It's also important who's the Speaker of the House and who's in charge of the Senate. And I hope young people increasingly understand that.

Dec 4, 2008

Krugman on Hardball

Nobel Prize-winning economist and NYT columnist Paul Krugman is in a unique position to influence the conversation on the next administration's fiscal and economic policies.

Here he is advocating a gigantic stimulus package on a scale of the national mobilization of World War II.

Sep 8, 2008

"Incendiary" Hosts Taken Off Election Anchor Chairs

Update: The Right Dictates MSNBC's Programming Decisions

What makes a political host incendiary? Holding Republicans accountable and asking questions.

These sins of Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews have caused MSNBC to take the two politicos off the anchor chairs, leading the cable channel’s election coverage.

Olbermann and Matthews are apparently not aware that their mandate is that of a stenographer, and propagandist delivering insipid descriptions of GOP-approved narratives.

Aug 25, 2008

MSNBC's Chuck Todd: Wisconsin Was Turning Point

Chuck Todd, top media politico, just said on MSNBC's Hardball that Wisconsin was the turning point in the 2008 Democratic primary.

Todd said that after Obama clobbered Hillary in Wisconsin on February 19, Hillary had only a 10 percent chance of getting the nomination, and not the 50 percent chance that Hillary's people and the media proclaimed.

Obama's Wisconsin victory, gained on the heels of his sweep in Virginia, Maryland and D.C. the week before, left many objective observers looking to Ohio and Pennsylvania (where Hillary won solid victories) as merely prolonging the inevitable Obama nomination.

Salon had a piece by Mike Madden in early May explaining the importance of Wisconsin's primary and probing why this perfectly composed demographic state for Hillary handed her a 17-point thrashing.

See also Wisconsin More Important than Pennsylvania Machine-State.