Showing posts with label money and politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label money and politics. Show all posts

May 19, 2015

Hillary Blasts Citizens United and Rightists on Supreme Court

The activist bent of the five GOP-appointed justices on the US Supreme Court has taken its toll on the rights of Americans against GOP racists aligned with predatory corporatists.

Hillary Clinton blasted the infamous Citizens United v. FED (2010) decision that absurdly granted American personhood status to for-profit corporations in an opinion that as predicted opened the floodgates to special interests money in politics as never before in history.

"I will do everything I can to appoint Supreme Court justices who protect the right to vote and do not protect the right of billionaires to buy elections," Mrs. Clinton said while on Day 1 of a two-day swing through Iowa. (New York Times)

Music to fellow Americans who still believe in the quaint notion that rights are conferred to human beings, and not legal entities.

As Justice Stevens notes in dissent (joined by Justice Ginsburg , Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor) in Citizens United:
The conceit that corporations must be treated identically to natural persons in the political sphere is not only inaccurate but also inadequate to justify the Court’s disposition of this case.

In the context of election to public office, the distinction between corporate and human speakers is significant. Although they make enormous contributions to our society, corporations are not actually members of it. They cannot vote or run for office. Because they may be managed and controlled by nonresidents, their interests may conflict in fundamental respects with the interests of eligible voters. The financial resources, legal structure, and instrumental orientation of corporations raise legitimate concerns about their role in the electoral process. Our lawmakers have a compelling constitutional basis, if not also a democratic duty, to take measures designed to guard against the potentially deleterious effects of corporate spending in local and national races.

Amen to that.

Elected Republicans still acclaim corporations enjoy personhood status as Americans to this day, directing the GOP's radical trajectory and associated attacks on the rights of political opponents to cast votes.

Apr 3, 2014

Kochs Brothers Freed-up to Spend Unlimited Money on Elections

Five GOP justices on the U.S. Supreme Court have opened the flood gates for huge-moneyed interests to spend without limit on political campaigns, as news broke the common American voter is being targeted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Janesville) and Wisconsin governor Scott Walker in a newly rolled-out initiative and signing of two new anti-voter laws.

In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, U.S. Supreme Court (12-536), the five-four majority ruled that placing limits on the total amount someone can spend in an election cycle is unconstitutional.

The old doctrine limiting vast amounts of money spent in political campaign as a check against corruption and the appearance of corruption has been rendered void with this ruling.

Any limit on campaign spending is in jeopardy, Court observers say. "Nothing is safe," said Rick Hasan. a professor at the University of California, Irvine School of Law.

In dissent, four justices note the Court’s decision "eviscerates our Nation’s campaign finance laws, leaving a remnant incapable of dealing with the grave problems of democratic legitimacy that those laws were intended to resolve." 

Meanwhile, Paul Ryan, a long-time foe of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, demonstrates anew that Ryan does not understand what Social Security is, but he wants it gone anyway.

As the news came the Koch brothers poured money into the small County Board races in northern Wisconsin and won five local races, the result of the McCutcheon ruling is that the Kochs could pour money into every municipal, county, state and national political race in the country without limit.

News also broke yesterday that Scott Walker quietly signed two more election bills into law, designed to make registering to vote more difficult and making it impossible for many students, elderly and low-income individuals to vote.

Walker also signed a bill giving election observers the right to stand three feet behind election poll workers, a law that gives GOP election observers effective license in a high turn-out election to harass voters and poll workers, sowing confusion for voters and creating disturbances at the polling place in another effort to obstruct voting.

From Andrea Kaminski, Executive Director of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin:

Apparently restricting early voting was not enough for Governor Walker. Today he signed more extreme election bills into law, including measures that will make it virtually impossible for many qualified citizens to register to vote and will make our polling places more contentious.

Act 182 (formerly SB 267) requires citizens to show proof-of‐residence whenever they register to vote, ending the current practice of allowing the clerk to check residence for people who register early. This will impact many people who have recently moved or are temporarily living with family or friends and who do not have a document such as a Wisconsin driver’s license or bank statement with their own name and current address. It will have a disproportionate impact on students, elderly and low-income individuals.

The Governor’s signing statement glossed over the impact of this new law, stating only that it requires clerks to record the type of document submitted as proof of residence. Apparently the Governor either is not aware of the content of the amended bill he signed or is not proud of having signed it.

Act 177 (formerly AB 202) allows election observers to be as close as three feet from the table where people are checking in or registering at their polling place. That is right behind the election official’s chair and close enough to see a birth date or account number on a proof-of‐residence document.

The League of Women Voters has trained and placed hundreds of election observers in polling places in our state, and we can attest that observers do not need to be that close in order to do their job. Having them hovering over the voting process will compromise voters’ privacy, put pressure on poll workers and make polling places more contentious.

For decades our state has been known for its policies that encourage citizens to be active participants in their government. That begins with voting, and our high voter turnout is something we can be proud of. These extreme new laws signed by Governor Walker will take Wisconsin backward by making it more difficult for many citizens to participate.

As an organization founded by the suffragists who fought for 75 years to win the right to vote for women, the League of Women Voters knows suppression when we see it. While our 17 local Leagues in the state will work to educate and assist voters in complying with the new restrictions, we will also be looking into all possible ways to reverse these unfair laws, including legal action.

Mar 27, 2008

30% of Hillary donors who threatened Pelosi slept in the Lincoln Bedroom during Bill's presidency

Great piece from AmericaBlog.

It looks like some gifts just keep on giving. 6 of the 20 big Dem donors who are now threatening to exort Nancy Pelosi on behalf of Hillary slept in the Lincoln Bedroom while Bill and Hillary were in the White House. You'll recall that some 831 or so special friends of the Clintons got to stay in the Lincoln Bedroom during four years of the Clinton presidency (that's about 4 a week, every week, for 4 years). ...

(Matt) Stoller also notes that nearly half of the group donated to Lieberman's Senate campaign.