Karl Rove leaked and participated in an ugly scheme to leak the identity of Valerie Plame, an (undercover) non-official cover CIA operative working on halting weapons of mass destruction proliferation.
The leaking occurred after Plame's husband, Joe Wilson, exposed in a
New York Times op-ed column one of the Bush administration's lies used to sell the invasion of Iraq.
Wilson's op-ed drew the attention of the highest officials in the U.S. government (Bush, Cheney, Rove and Libby), where orders for the subsequent leak of Wilson's wife were found to have originated.
Rove hit the Sunday talk shows to deny all this, getting in some last-ditch lies before he leaves at the end of August.
Two things about Rove's blowing the cover of this CIA operative are striking.
If a democratic administration had done this (a President Clinton, Edwards, or Obama), we would hear non-stop howls of
treason and "
unprecedented" betrayal, widespread impeachment calls, banner
Country in Crisis coverage on the news networks and Bob Dole talking about how all of what he fought for was being betrayed by the administration.
Does this reaction describe coverage of Rove and Co. as Rove leaves government?
Even today, rightwing pundits look to excuse the leak, as Lewis Libby, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and George W. Bush have their crimes and lies almost completely covered up with the tremendous help of their friends.
Even Libby, found guilty of lying and obstructing justice, has his sentence commuted while Bush is still in office.
Via
ThinkProgress
During his
tour of the Sunday shows this morning, Karl Rove attempted to downplay and dismiss his role in the CIA leak scandal, telling Fox News’ Chris Wallace that he acted benignly in his conversations with reporters about Valerie Plame’s identity:
What I did say to one reporter was, I’ve heard that, too. And what I said to another reporter, off the record, was, in essence, I don’t think you ought to be writing about this.Appearing on
Meet The Press today, Matthew Cooper, one of the reporters to whom Rove spoke about Plame, said Rove’s version of the story was hard to believe. “I think he was dissembling to put it charitably,” said Cooper. “To imply that he didn’t know about [Plame’s identity], or that he heard it in some rumor out in the hallways, is nonsense.”
Cooper also contradicted Rove’s characterization of their conversation, describing the “essence” of it as much more than just an attempt to wave him off the story:
Look, Karl Rove told me about Valerie Plame’s identity on July 11, 2003. I called him because Ambassador Wilson [Plame’s husband] was in the news that week. I didn’t know Ambassador Wilson even had a wife until I talked to Karl Rove and he said that she worked at the agency and she worked on WMD.Cooper’s right. Rove is peddling “non-sense” with his brushed off description of his role in the leak scandal. On
Meet The Press, Rove also declared, “if a journalist had said to me, ‘I’d like you to confirm this,’ my answer would have been ‘I can’t, I don’t know, I’ve heard that too,’”
But as Cooper notes, Rove not only confirmed to him that Plame worked at the CIA, but he willingly pushed the information to him without it even being solicited, telling him that she “
works at the agency on wmd [weapons of mass destruction] issues.”
When pressed by Wallace about his conversation with Cooper, however, Rove resorted to the administration’s
standard line when asked about inconvenient facts: “I don’t recall.”
UPDATE:
Crooks and Liars has more on Rove’s Meet the Press appearance
here and
here.
UPDATE II: Marcy Wheeler, who wrote a
book about the Plame scandal, debunks Rove’s
Meet the Press claims
here.
###
