Showing posts with label Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Secretary of Veterans Affairs. Show all posts

Nov 11, 2020

Decorated Army Combat Veteran, Jim Rudisill v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Veterans Day 2020 

 
Why the bureaucratic lust to screw our veterans over?
 
Doesn't everyone love veterans? No.

Veterans Day 2020 sees the veterans rights community rallying around another veteran, identified as "Bo" in administrative court litigation at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Watch this veterans rights case, BO v Wilkie, next month, it will signal a lot about how we really care about our veterans.

It's a fight for veterans' benefits guaranteed by Congress.

Until them Happy Veterans Day 2020

By Christie Garella

BO v Wilkie Overview

Two veterans were introduced at church. One veteran was unexpectedly denied Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to attend Yale divinity school because of a “misinterpretation”, following a multi-year process to gain his church’s endorsement to attend seminary and admission to Yale Divinity School. Hunton Andrews Kurth attorney Tim McHugh, who coincidentally used the Post-9/11 GI Bill to attend college and law school after serving in the Army, took on the case along with a Dominion Energy’s Pro Bono attorney and fellow veteran.

In August 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims issued a major decision in the case - BO v Wilkie - that could restore billions of dollars in Post-9/11 GI Bill and other educational benefits to military service members of the Post-9/11 era. The court rejected the practice of capping the benefits and reversed a decision by the VA’s Board of Veterans’ Appeals, ordering the board to recalculate BO’s entitlement to GI Bill benefits. In January 2020, the court denied the VA’s motion to stay the BO decision. The VA has since filed an appeal which was authorized by the Solicitor General in May 2020. The case is pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with the telephonic oral argument scheduled for December 9, 2020.

GI Bill Background

Since World War II, Congress has provided veterans with different GI Bill benefits for different periods of qualifying service. HOWEVER, since 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs began capping most veterans’ combined GI Bill benefits at 36 months if they had more than one period of separately qualifying service.

Sep 21, 2010

VA Senate Comm Hearing Draws Attention as Cuts in Veterans' Benefits Feared

- Hearing Thursday (September 23) United States Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs Oversight Hearing: VA Disability Compensation: Presumptive Disability Decision-Making. VA Secretary Shinseki should publicly blast the sad sacks who sit on the United States Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs -

As the continuing lurid, anti-veteran drips emit from congress, it appears one U.S. senator after another issues statements of concern that veterans' benefits cost money.

Early this Summer it was Sen. James Webb (D-VA) and Sen Daniel K. Akaka (D-Hawaii) of United States Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs fairly squawking for a delay in the implementation of the expanded Agent Orange-related presumptives illnesses rule.

Of course, the usual cabal of anti-veteran interests has kept up the pressure.

Former Sen. Alan Simpson, Republican co-chair of the President’s Deficit Commission, in early September said, “the irony (is) that the veterans who saved this country are now, in a way, not helping us to save the country in this fiscal mess.” Simpson once was chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, and his anti-veteran commitments help guide us to this disgraceful situation where we are still arguing about helping victims of Agent Orange.

Yesterday, the ranking leading Republican on the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) joined the anti-veteran chorus.

Mike Baker reports Burr blasting the Agent Orange-related presumptives illnesses rule: "We’d like to make sure that, one, the science has a causal link, and two, that the defined population is an appropriate one,” said Burr.

Webb and his anti-veteran cohorts appear upset that VA Sec Shinseki has pushed on moving forward the Agent Orange presumtives rule without partnering with the sufficient Congressional stalling.

"On March 25, 2010, the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced his intention to add B-cell Leukemia, Parkinson’s disease, and coronary artery disease to the list of presumptive conditions associated with exposure to Agent Orange," wrote Sen Webb in July in reply to a veteran who wrote Webb blasting his stall tactics. "This decision was taken without full consultation with the Congress."

Whether the hearing Thursday will be an exercise in political damage control or a continuation of the Vietnam veteran animus in Congress, one thing is certain: Never will Vietnam veterans ever trust this Congress again.

And VA Secretary Shinseki has gained some new supporters for his commitment on this issue. He should continue the fight Thursday and publicly blast the sad sacks who sit on the United States Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Agent Orange is a political game for the likes of Webb, Burr and Simpson. Veterans who don't play know better.