Showing posts with label Scott Walker's DNR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scott Walker's DNR. Show all posts

Jun 25, 2015

Science Chief of Wisconsin DNR Retires in Face of Hostile Walker Admin

Steven Verburg writing in the Wisconsin State Journal reports on another scientist leaving public service in the face of the hostile Scott Walker administration:

The director of a state science office facing severe budget cuts after riling Republicans with research on topics such as climate change has confirmed that he is retiring, with some predicting additional departures.

Jack Sullivan, 62, said Wednesday he has been told not to talk about budget cuts that will eliminate more than half of the senior scientist positions from the state Department of Natural Resources Science Services Bureau. But he said this budget had been the most challenging of his 36-year career and the impending cuts played a role in his decision to leave now.

Critics of the budget working its way through the GOP-controlled Legislature predicted Sullivan’s departure signals the beginning of an exodus of DNR scientists mirroring the loss of some top talent at UW-Madison, which is also facing significant reductions and uncertainty about tenure rights.

Scientists, intellectuals, non-partisan auditors, non-Republicans in government, community control, minorities, and college students are all under varying degrees of attack by Scott Walker and Wisconsin legislative Republicans.

Sep 3, 2014

City High-Capacity Well Made Town Water Wells Go Dry, Town May Sue Stevens Point

Updated - Scott Walker made a conscious decision to have the DNR operate in its handing out high capacity water wells like candy at Halloween.

No Republican dissented, certainly not State Rep. Scott Krug (R-Nekoosa) representing part of the Central Sands region of Wisconsin vulnerable to high capacity wells and application of liquid cow manure.

This last Spring when new, even worse high capacity water well legislation would have been killed in the Senate, some in the Assembly felt safe to vote 'No' for the time being amid the tide of rapidly growing pro-water citizen movements, that will likely vote Krug out of his assembly district drawn to elect Republicans.

Kevin Carr of WSAU has a piece out reporting the Town of Hull is considering suing Stevens Point because the City's high capacity water well caused complete water loss for many Town residents.

Reports Carr:

It's known as Well 11; a high capacity well used by the City of Stevens Point. Not long after it first went online in May of 2012, residents in the Town of Hull started noticing some problems.

"Within 6 months or so, people started losing their water supply," Town Chairperson John Holdridge said.

Aaron Heckel is one of the residents who lost nearly all of his water after Well 11 went online.

"We couldn't shower or cook or do anything. The water would just regenerate a little bit throughout the day," Heckel said.

The well is being blamed for lowering the water supply. Town records show that since the well was first used, almost 40 residents have either been forced to drill new, deeper wells, or experience water pressure issues. Those who chose to replace their wells say it wasn't cheap.

The potential litigation on this two-year-old issue [see Town of Hull Water Issues) follows the new policy instituted in 2011 by Scott Walker's Department of Natural Resources to adopt presumptive approval to high capacity water well applications, as though the Wisconsin aquifers were unlimited in what Walker said is, .

"In a state with about 15,000 lakes and more than a quadrillion gallons of groundwater, it is hard to believe that water could ever be in short supply. Experts say, however, that the burgeoning number of so-called high-capacity wells is drawing down some ground and surface water," reports Kate Prengaman at WisconsinWatch.

Seemingly every week, there is a new story about a river, stream, aquifer or lake being drained or toxify or both.

"The number of these so-called high-capacity wells in Wisconsin has exploded exponentially in recent years due to sprawl, expanding dairy and agricultural operations and dozens of new frac sand mines, note The Political Environment.

Former DNR Secretary George Meyer said the DNR under Scott Walker "has failed to lead the way on studying the health and environmental impacts of rapidly growing industries such as sand mining and the spread of high-capacity water wells." (Verburg, Wisconsin State Journal)

"In Walker’s first year in office he turned the DNR into an 'enterprise agency' with 'increased operating flexibility to enable the agency to improve customer service and business support.' This shifted staff and resources away from monitoring, oversight and compliance with environmental regulations and created the Office of Business Support and Sustainability at a time when two major threats to clean air and water were ramping up: Frac sand mining and massive Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) with thousands of head of livestock," notes Rebecca Kimble in The Progressive Magazine (March 2013).

Hull (population 5,346 ) is adjacent to Stevens Point (population 26,717).

Portage County in central Wisconsin is located where the Northern Highlands region meet the Central Plains or Central Sands region of Wisconsin.

Aug 19, 2013

DNR Holds Mine Hearing Under the Wrong State Statute, Says Atty

Updated - Turns out the rush to work on G-Tec's behalf has the DNR missing things like the rule of law and administrative procedure

The overwhelming opposition expressed by the public at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources hearing on August 15 up in Hurley, Wisconsin no doubt fell on deaf ears in the Scott Walker administration.

The mining company calls the shots in the Walker administration, not the Wisconsin public.

The DNR Public Hearing on G-Tac Bulk Sampling and pre-Application Notice drew over 100 people, almost all of whom voiced sentiments that the plans for the mine in Iron and Ashland counties are "crazy."

Now, a well-regarded Iron County attorney is contending the DNR held the hearing under the wrong state statute.

Anthony Stella's analysis is expected to be run in the afternoon on Monday, August 19 at The StellaReport. Stella's piece is now out.

Attorney Stella is all-concerned about that rule of law thing.

Reads Stella's letter is part:

I am writing to inform you that I believe that the DNR proceeded prematurely and without proper notice with regard to the August 15 bulk sampling hearing in Hurley. After studying the new legislation, it seems clear to me that a bulk sampling hearing cannot be held until after the DNR determines which, if any, approvals are required by GTAC. Of course, that process has not been completed yet, as GTAC still hasn’t supplied all necessary information requested as of this date. In the event that no approvals are ultimately required, THEN the DNR may proceed under Section 295.46, giving notice as it did for the August 15 hearing. If approvals are required, however, it must proceed under Section 295.45, and give the specific notices required therein. The DNR has told GTAC that, pending the receipt of more information, certain approvals may be required. ...