Showing posts with label Haaretz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Haaretz. Show all posts

Apr 16, 2010

Israel Targets Haaretz Newspaper, Still Hunts Top Journalist

Journalist Uri Blau remains in hiding, hunted by the state of Israel. The liberal Haaretz newspaper staff has roused a siege-like mentality.

And the Israeli public would have the blood of any Israeli citizen and human rights activist who blew the whistle on Israel's crimes against humanity in its well-planned 2008 Gaza massacre. Or not, let the secret police head decide, and let whatever happens, happen.

Writes an incensed Haaretz columnist Gideon Levy in "If it were up to the [Israeli] people, Anat Kamm would be executed":

"The head of the Shin Bet [Israel's secret police] threatens a journalist, and it's business as usual, nobody says a word. Nobody got into a tizzy after these brutal words were uttered, nobody even asked what exactly Diskin [director of Shin Bet, Yuval Diskin] was getting at. Nobody even bothered to ask if it was in fact the Shin Bet that broke into Blau's apartment and ransacked it."

Anat Kamm leaked documents detailing facts of the coming Israeli Gaza atrocity to Haaretz journalist Uri Blau in 2008.

Kamm is now under house arrest and stands accused of "espionage with intent to harm the state, a charge that carries [up to] 25 years in jail." (Cook)

What was the December 2008 Gaza massacre?

Think of the World War II NAZI atrocity, the 1942 massacre of the village of Lidice (then Lidice, Czechoslovakia) in retaliation for killing a NAZI whom the NAZIs viewed as protected by their Christian God. Now multiply Lidice by ten and you get Gaza, December 2008, that followed years of "protracted collective punishment."

Well, we can write about Israel in these pages. Object, and declare that its crimes are not committed in our names.

Most of the American public would agree. Most of American Jewry agrees.

The U.S. Congress on the other hand is on record supporting Israel and trashing the U.N. Goldstone Report; though on January 21, 2010 a letter signed by 54 members of Congress was sent to President Obama calling for a halt to the Israeli blockade of Gaza, describing the siege as an “ongoing crisis” that would lead to “disastrous” political and humanitarian consequences.

That's the most we have accomplished so far as the "ongoing crisis" works its magic against those not-chosen people [Arabs] in the Middle-East.

A Shin Bet State

Israel Targets Ha'aretz

By JONATHAN COOK

Nazareth

An Arab member of the Israeli parliament is demanding that a newspaper be allowed to publish an investigative report that was suppressed days before Israel attacked Gaza in winter 2008.

The investigation by Uri Blau, who has been in hiding since December to avoid arrest, concerned Israeli preparations for the impending assault on Gaza, known as Operation Cast Lead.

In a highly unusual move, according to reports in the Israeli media, the army ordered the Haaretz newspaper to destroy all copies of an edition that included Blau’s investigation after it had already gone to press and been passed by the military censor. The article was never republished.

Blau has gone underground in London after the Shin Bet, Israel’s secret police, demanded he return to Israel to hand back hundreds of classified documents they claim are in his possession and to reveal his sources. He published several additional reports for Haaretz in 2008 and 2009 that severely embarrassed senior military commanders by showing they had issued orders that intentionally violated court rulings, including to execute Palestinians who could be safely apprehended.

Haneen Zoubi, an MP who previously headed an Israeli media-monitoring organization, said it was “outrageous” that the suppressed report was still secret so long after the Gaza attack. She is to table a parliamentary question to Ehud Barak, the defense minister, today demanding to know why the army suppressed the article and what is preventing its publication now. Barak must respond within 21 days.

She said publication of the article was important both because Israel had been widely criticized for killing many hundreds of civilians in its three-week assault on Gaza, and because subsequent reports suggested that Israeli commanders sought legal advice months before the operation to manipulate the accepted definitions of international law to make it easier to target civilians.

“There must be at least a strong suspicion that Mr Blau’s article contains vital information, based on military documentation, warning of Israeli army intentions to commit war crimes,” she said in an interview. “If so, then there is a public duty on Haaretz to publish the article. If not, then there is no reason for the minister to prevent publication after all this time.”

Zoubi’s call yesterday followed mounting public criticism of Haaretz for supporting Blau by advising him to stay in hiding and continuing to pay his salary. In chat forums and talkback columns, the reporter has been widely denounced as a traitor. Several MPs have called for Haaretz to be closed down or boycotted.

A Haaretz spokeswoman refused to comment, but a journalist there said a “fortress mentality” had developed at the newspaper. “We’ve all been told not to talk to anyone about the case,” he said. “There’s absolute paranoia that the paper is going to be made to suffer because of the Blau case.”

Amal Jamal, a professor at Tel Aviv University who teaches a media course, said he was concerned with the timing of the Shin Bet’s campaign against Blau. He observed that they began interviewing the reporter about his sources and documents last summer as publication neared of the Goldstone report, commissioned by the United Nations and which embarrassed Israel by alleging it had perpetrated war crimes in Gaza.

“The goal in this case appears to be not only to intimidate journalists but also to delegitimize certain kinds of investigations concerning security issues, given the new climate of sensitivity in Israel following the Goldstone report.” He added that Blau, who had quickly acquired a reputation as Israel’s best investigative reporter, was “probably finished” as a journalist in Israel.

Shraga Elam, an award-winning Israeli reporter, said Blau’s suppressed article might also haverevealed the aims of a widely mentioned but unspecified “third phase” of the Gaza attack, following the initial air strikes and a limited ground invasion, that was not implemented. He suspected the plans involved pushing some of Gaza’s population into Egypt under cover of a more extensive ground invasion. The plan had been foiled, he believed, because Hamas offered little resistance and Egypt refused to open the border.

On Monday, an MP with the centrist Kadima Party, Yulia Shamal-Berkovich, called for Haaretz to be closed down, backing a similar demand from fellow MP Michael Ben-Ari, of the right-wing National Union. She accused Haaretz management of having “chosen to hide” over the case and blamed it for advising Mr Blau to remain abroad. She said the newspaper “must make sure the materials that are in his possession are returned. If Haaretz fails to do so, its newspaper licence should be revoked without delay.”

Another Kadima MP, Yisrael Hasson, a former deputy head of the Shin Bet, this week urged Haaretz readers to boycott the newspaper until Blau is fired. A petition calling on the Shin Bet to end its threat to charge Blau with espionage has attracted the signatures of several prominent journalists in Israel.

“We believe the Blau case is unique and are concerned this unique case will create a dangerous precedent,” their letter states. “Until now, prosecution authorities have not sought to try reporters for the offence of holding classified information, an offence most of us are guilty of in one way or another.”

A group of Israeli human rights organisations is due to submit a letter this week to the government demanding that the investigation concentrate on lawbreaking by the army rather the “character assassination” of Blau and his sources.

Yesterday, the supreme court tightened restrictions on Anat Kamm, one of Blau’s main informants, who has been under house arrest since December for copying up to 2,000 military documents while she was a soldier. She is accused of espionage with intent to harm the state, a charge that carries a tariff of 25 years in jail.

The papers copied by Kamm, 23, included military orders that violated court rulings and justified law-breaking by soldiers.

Judge Ayala Procacciasaid: “The acts attributed to the respondent point to a deep internal distorted perception of a soldier's duties to the military system he or she is required to serve, and a serious perversion from the basic responsibility that a citizen owes the state to which he or she belongs.” Kamm, the court decided, must not leaveher apartment and must be watched by a close relative at all times.

Media coverage of the case in Israel has been largely hostile to both Kamm and Blau. Gideon Levy observed in Haaretz today: “The real betrayal has been that of the journalists, who have betrayed their profession -- journalists who take sides with the security apparatus against colleagues who are doing their job bringing light to the dark.”

Calling Israel “a Shin Bet state”, Levy added: “If it depended on public opinion, Kamm and Blau would be executed and Haaretz would be shut down on the spot.”

Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His latest books are “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” (Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel's Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website is http://www.jkcook.net/.

A version of this article originally appeared in The National (http://www.thenational.ae/), published in Abu Dhabi.

Jan 18, 2010

The Face of Israeli Oppression

Stifling dissent in the name of security. Police arrest CEO of Israeli civil rights group

"Jerusalem police responded, saying it was an illegal protest of anarchists and leftist activists who did not listen to police orders."

Update:17/01/2010January 17, 2010: Following a late-night Court hearing last night, all 17 protesters arrested following Friday's quiet and lawful demonstration in Sheikh Jarrah in East Jerusalem, including ACRI Executive Director Hagai El-Ad, were released without charge or conditions.
The Jerusalem Magistrates Court ruled, in response to arguments prepared by a team of lawyers led by ACRI, that the demonstration was of the type that did not require a permit and as such the police were not acting on the basis of protecting the public order in arresting the protesters. The Judge further ruled that there was no rationale for the arrests or for the diffusion of the demonstration.
On Saturday night, a protest vigil attended by about 150 individuals was held at Jerusalem's Russian Compound during a hearing at the Magistrates Court to support the release of the 17 protesters and to condemn the arrests which constitute a severe breach of freedom of expression. ACRI condemns the arrests of the demonstrators as a severe and troubling blow to Israeli democracy.
Press release - January 16, 2010: Following the arrests on Friday of 17 demonstrators in Sheikh Jarrah, including Hagai El-Ad, ACRI’s Executive Director, ACRI strongly condemned the suppression of the protest by the police, which was done without legal justification. The protest was disbanded by force even though it was held legally, without provocation or disturbance to public order.
ACRI warns that this is part of a worrying trend on the part of the authorities to limit freedom of demonstration and arrest demonstrators under false or illegitimate pretenses. ACRI's Chief Legal Counsel, Dan Yakir, stated that the police's claim that the protest was an unlawful gathering was baseless, as the law recognizes the importance of the basic right to demonstrate and allows protests of large numbers of people so long as no disturbance is caused to vehicles and no political speeches are made. Yakir said, “The police's claim that by using a megaphone the protesters turned the event into one in which political speeches were voiced is absurd, and it's a claim which has been dismissed on previous occasions. The law referred to was intended to broadly allow demonstrations, and therefore it is clear that the arrests were carried out unlawfully".
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued a condemnation following the arrests. Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU, said, “We wish to express our steadfast support for the right of Hagai El-Ad and our sister organization, ACRI, to protect and promote civil liberties and human rights in Israel. While we take no position on domestic issues within Israel, we are deeply concerned that one of Israel's top human rights’ leaders has been detained for peaceably expressing his views”.
The New Israel Fund also condemned the arrests. Daniel Sokatch, NIF's Chief Executive Officer, said: “Following last week's detention and interrogation of activist Anat Hoffman for leading a women's prayer group at the Western Wall, it appears that a disturbing pattern of police intimidation is beginning to emerge. NIF stands shoulder to shoulder with Hagai, Anat and other civil society leaders working to build a better Israel. Attempts to silence their voices only serve to remind us how critical it is that we continue - and indeed redouble - our support for their efforts."
Background:During the past five months, Israelis and Palestinians have held joint protest marches and demonstrations against the eviction of two Palestinian families from the homes they've lived in since 1948 so as to allow Jewish families to inhabit these homes, located in the heart of a Palestinian neighborhood.
The court accepted the claims of the Sephardic Community Committee, according to which the homes were owned by Jews before 1948. However, the eviction was met with strong condemnation and international uproar since according to Israeli law, Palestinians who left their homes during times of war, in 1948 and 1967, are barred from reclaiming their properties. Thus, the asymmetry in which reclaimed property is dealt with by the Israeli authorities and in light of the severe infringement on the basic rights of the Palestinian families - rights to life in dignity, shelter and property - several groups and individuals began organizing peaceful protests at the site of the homes.
Last updated 17/01/2010

Aug 14, 2008

Haaretz: U.S. puts brakes on Israeli plan to strike Iran

Is the predicted catastrophic economic and political fall-out from an Israeli strike against Iran preventing the U.S. from giving Israel a go-ahead?

A Haaretz article by Aluf Benn reads that the U.S. is putting the brakes on the execution of a strike:

The American administration has rejected an Israeli request for military equipment and support that would improve Israel's ability to attack Iran's nuclear facilities.

A report published last week by the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) states that military strikes are unlikely to destroy Iran's centrifuge program for enriching uranium.

The Americans viewed the request, which was transmitted (and rejected) at the highest level, as a sign that Israel is in the advanced stages of preparations to attack Iran. They therefore warned Israel against attacking, saying such a strike would undermine American interests. They also demanded that Israel give them prior notice if it nevertheless decided to strike Iran.

Nov 26, 2007

The Middle East summit: mission impossible?


Update: II: Fantasy vs. Reality in Palestine-Israel
Heading for Annapolis

Update: Gideon Levy in Haaretz: "Demands of a thief"

... Security? We (Israel) must defend ourselves by defensive means. Those who do not believe that the only security we will enjoy will come from ending the occupation and from peace can entrench themselves in the army, and behind walls and fences. But we have no right to do what we are doing: Just as no one would conceive of killing the residents of an entire neighborhood, to harass and incarcerate it because of a few criminals living there, there is no justification for abusing an entire people in the name of our security. The question of whether ending the occupation would threaten or strengthen Israel's security is irrelevant. There are not, and cannot be, any preconditions for restoring justice.

No one will discuss this at Annapolis. Even if the real core issues were raised, they would focus on secondary questions -borders, Jerusalem and even refugees. But that would be escaping the main issue. After 40 years, one might have expected that the real core issue would finally be raised for honest and bold discussion: Does Israel have the moral right to continue the occupation? The world should have asked this long ago. The Palestinians should have focused only on this. And above all, we, who bear the guilt, should have been terribly troubled by the answer to this question.

I think Rachel Corrie, an American peace activist, killed by an Israeli bulldozer in 2003 (pictured above) would agree with Levy.

The Independent asks if a breakthrough at the Middle East summit is a mission impossible for the Bush administration.

In light of Bush's hostility to a two-state settlement, a more accurate headline might read Mission Indifferent or Mission Antagonistic.

Outside of the U.S., most of the rest of the world (including much of Israel) see the summit for the long-winded PR stunt that it is.

Rupert Cornwell reports for The Independent:

This week will see George Bush make his first, and almost certainly his only, major attempt to bring an end to the world's most intractable conflict. As participants gather for tomorrow's Middle East conference in Annapolis, Maryland, the spotlight is on the Israelis, the Palestinians, the Syrians and the Saudis – but the most important consideration lies closer to home: how will President Bush fare in a belated attempt to play peacemaker.
###

Jul 17, 2007

Condi Rice Prattle

From Haaretz today, but you can just about pick any day when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice speaks on Iraq and the Middle East to hear her pseudo-intellectual posturing and sullying of the profession of history that most of the world ridicules whenever she prattles on in service to George W. Bush:

As Haaretz' Shmuel Rosner writes, quoting Rice:

"History will judge, but I know enough to know- myself as a historian - that today's headlines are rarely the same as history's judgment, and I think that's going to be the case here as well," U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in an interview earlier this week.

Rice was referring to the policies of U.S. President George W. Bush, which she still believes will be seen as more successful in retrospect than they are being seen now.


In April 2006 in England, Rice offered up:

“I know we’ve made tactical errors, thousands of them, I’m sure. But when you look back in history what will be judged will be, did you make the right strategic decisions (in Iraq).”

Rice is a historian, you see, and from her towering heights can see the invasion of Iraq as an epistemological riddle that can only be solved in the long-term future, rendering mere American citizens holding the administration accountable today a short-sighted, pedestrian exercise.

Here's one from last month on the Palestinians and Bush's Herculean efforts to pursue democracy over there, "It's hard for democracy to take hold in a place in which it has not taken hold before but I am confident about the triumph of these values because I have seen it happen before. And I am exceedingly aware that it's a rare circumstance in which today's headlines are consistent with history's judgment," Rice said. (Reuters, June 25, 2007)

She's a historian, she knows and can see what we cannot, even over the many bodies piling up.

Wonder what real historians think of Rice.
###

Jun 3, 2007

The MAeLstrom

[A scan of news articles and commentary on the internet.]

Adminstration Takes Aim at Troop Support: From the New York Times: Whenever and however American troops withdraw from Iraq, a flood of wounded and psychologically damaged veterans will present the nation for decades to come with costly needs that already are overwhelming government services. The backlog of disability claims stands at more than 405,000, with cases averaging 177 days to be processed — almost twice the backlog for civilians. Experts estimate that an additional 400,000 claims will be filed in the next two years. ... While talking a lot about supporting the troops and using them shamelessly in Congressional battles and election years, the administration has systematically shortchanged the wounded and maimed who make it back from harm’s way. The nation has a moral obligation to help them face a whole new challenge of survival.

Gore on Bush Propaganda: From Juan Cole’s Informed Comment: It is no surprise that Al Gore is attacking Bush in his new book, of course. Nor is it a surprise that Gore accuses Bush of ignoring all reasonable evidence in both making the decision to invade Iraq and in deciding to do nothing about global warming.What is important about what Gore is saying is his focus on how the pollution of America's information environment by 1) corporate media consolidation (all television news is brought to Americans by five private corporations, the CEOs of which all vote Republican) and 2) government propaganda …

Democracy and Muslim Sharia Law: Rob Kall asks at opednews.com if they can live together: “It doesn't look like democracy fares very well when Sharia Law is allowed much power. In supposedly democratic Malaysia, a country which describes itself as a Muslim country, the right of a person to choose his or own religion is no longer in question. You can't decide to stop being a Muslim if that's what you want to do.”

Israeli Foreign Minister: I voted for a one-day occupation of Lebanon: From Haaretz: Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni told the Winograd Committee investigating the Second Lebanon War that, in a cabinet vote at the war's outset, she believed she was approving an operation that would last one night."As far as I was concerned, we set out on July 12 on an operation that was supposed to end that night - or the next afternoon, at the latest," Livni said, according to testimony released by the committee Sunday.

Attacks on U.S. Troops in Iraq Grow in Lethality, Complexity: From The Washington Post: As U.S. troops push more deeply into Baghdad and its volatile outskirts, Iraqi insurgents are using increasingly sophisticated and lethal means of attack, including bigger roadside bombs that are resulting in greater numbers of American fatalities relative to the number of wounded.

###