 |
| The competency and fitness of presiding Judge Bruce Schroeder has called into question the Kyle Rittehouse trial integrity |
Apparently Corrupt Judge Hints He'll Dismiss Case
Calls Prosecution's Presentation a "House of Cards"
Terms Coming Ruling on Video "Day of Reckoning"
Update: Threat of Rittenhouse-friendly judge declaring mistrial now looms over trial.
Madison, Wisconsin — Kyle Rittenhouse defense attorneys attempted to stop multiple viewings of videos in evidence by the jury that show Rittenhouse killing people.
The Rittenhouse legal team's reasoning is unclear, and the attempt appears to be unsuccessful, dispatches by Michael Tarm, AP legal affairs writer, show this morning.
The dispatches posted on the social media site, Twitter, also show the 75-year-old Judge Bruce Schroeder continuing his hostility towards the prosecution in outbursts that sometimes appear mercurial and manic.
The "Rittenhouse judge mentions a pending motion for mistrial and then alludes to the state's case as potentially 'a house of cards,'" reports the AP's Tarn at 1:00 P.M.
Later, just after 2:00 P. M., the AP. reports, "Rittenhouse judge says he could rule on a mistrial motion after a verdict or if the jurors ask to see the disputed [drone] video,"
#Rittenhouse judge mentions a pending motion for mistrial and then alludes to the state's case as potentially "a house of cards."
— Michael Tarm (@mtarm) November 17, 2021
#Rittenhouse judge says he could rule on a mistrial motion after a verdict or if the jurors ask to see the disputed drome video. https://t.co/ILthxUjm5t
— Michael Tarm (@mtarm) November 17, 2021
The antics by the judge have many observers concerned that Judge Bruce Schroeder will not allow a verdict adverse to Rittenhouse because Schroeder has already predetermined the outcome of the trial.
Schroeder has now "warned prosecutors that if it turns out upon further scrutiny that the
video should not have been admitted into evidence in the first place: 'It’s going to be ugly.'"
This could actually mean that if Schroeder checks media coverage again, and determines he was been the source of more ridicule, he'll dismiss the case out of spite.
But Judge Schroeder warned prosecutors that if it turns out upon further scrutiny that the video should not have been admitted into evidence in the first place: “It’s going to be ugly.”
— Michael Tarm (@mtarm) November 18, 2021
Part of that ugliness could be a post-verdict mistrial for #Rittenhouse. https://t.co/DNzl8hqvvm
No comments:
Post a Comment