Steven Avery Attorney Hits Wisconsin Judge for Constructing Adverse Ruling Against Facts and Law — Awaiting Corrupt Ruling

Madison, Wisconsin — The attorney representing Steven Avery offered a harsh opinion this morning that a presiding circuit court judge is constructing an adverse ruling in an effort to preserve what attorney argues is the wrongful conviction of Avery, featured in the Emmy-winning Making a Murderer.

Kathleen Zellner writes in Twitter: "The lower court is facing the impossible task of constructing an adverse ruling that will not be reversed by the higher court. The facts and clearcut laws will be the wrecking ball of this house of cards. Time to do the right thing for Steven Avery."

The lower court is facing the impossible task of constructing an adverse ruling that will not be reversed by the higher court. The facts & clearcut laws will be the wrecking ball of this house of cards. Time to do the right thing for Steven Avery. #JusticeNow #MakingAMurderer https://t.co/QpEoWrt6vY

— Kathleen Zellner (@ZellnerLaw) May 30, 2019

Advocates for Steven Avery are growing angry at what appears to be the corrupt effort by Sheboygan County Judge Angela W. Sutkiewicz (substituting) who apparently reached a result adverse to Steven Avery in State v. Steven A. Avery, Appeal Number 2017AP002288 long ago.

But Sutkiewicz works backwards. Result first, then draft an order and opinion to support the position of corrupt Wisconsin law enforcement, an opinion that will, law enforcement and Sutkiewicz believe, prevail in appellate court for a time — a delaying tactic.

The prosecution led by Attorney General Joshua Kaul (D) is employing the legal services of corrupt state attorneys including Mark Williams, Asst Attorney General and Special Prosecutor Thomas J. Fallon, and Special Prosecutor Norman Gahn.

Fallon and Gahn do not challenge the oft-repeated fact that the two corrupt jurists not only worked together to illegally destroy evidence, the two DoJ attorneys now write legal filings opposing Zellner's March 11 call for a reversal or new trial in post-conviction litigation.

Before Zellner won her motion for a remand (sending back) the case to circuit court, Zellner argued in her Feb. 1 legal filing:

The [State] ... conveys an attitude of impunity for its past actions of withholding exculpatory evidence and its current action of continuing the concealment of its destruction of potentially exculpatory or useful evidence. ...

Kahl, Ken Kratz, Mark Williams, Thomas J. Fallon, and Norman Gahn. This is Wisconsin law enforcement. And Angela W. Sutkiewicz is the Wisconsin judiciary.

Fallon and Gahn argue that the evidence they help destroy was "inexplicably released" in their  March 29, 2019 legal filing, (p 13).

In its late-March legal filing, the DoJ argues procedural objections to Avery's charges of bad-faith evidence destruction, deceit, concealment and deception, all of which present Due Process questions, (Steven Avery legal filings; #Work with KZ, WBAY, WLUK).

The deception of the DoJ attorneys veered into another spectacle in February when state attorney Mark Williams left a Feb errant voicemail message to Thomas Fallon on Zellner's phone, plotting how to mislead Zellner.